Sonia Congress hopes that by slandering Ramdev and the RSS, it will be able to put a lid on mounting allegations of corruption against the party and the Government
The battle of Kaliyuga has begun...
So who will win this battle?
June 09, 2011 6:47:49 PM
Francois Gautier
http://www.dailypioneer.com/
http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/2011/06/sonia-congress-hopes-that-by-slandering.html
Previously, the Congress was able to brazen out scandalous truth through bullying, deceit, lying and political cunning. Now it hopes that by slandering Ramdev and the RSS, it will be able to put a lid on mounting allegations of corruption against the party and the Government
The world is a battlefield. All great gurus and avatars have incarnated themselves throughout the ages to help the forces of good, which in India are called 'dharmic', against forces which are inimical to the Evolution of Humanity and which are called 'adharmic', or even asuric.
The concept of the asura in India is very different from the West. There is no such thing here as the black and white renderings of American cartoons or the Christian idea of a benevolent god and a cruel devil. Keen observers of human history may have noticed that very often asuric forces take on the face of goodness and charity, or use half truths or semi-lies to appear good. But in the end, the harm they do should make them recognisable to all.
In this light, we can discard Mr Digvijay Singh: He incarnates the world of sycophancy, which is a perversion of the Indian bhakti tradition. Or even Mr Kapil Sibal, a more intelligent man, but who got so perverted by a lawyer's mind that lying has become a second nature to him. History will probably judge Mr Manmohan Singh as a weak man, who was ready to close his eyes on everything just to stay in power.
But what about Ms Sonia Gandhi? What are the forces which are using her, maybe even in spite of her? Let us discard all those evil avatars attributed to her, such as her being a KGB or a Vatican agent, rumours which has been floating around for a long time. We should not also look at her personality, what she projects, or what people say about her, not even at her deeds. No, it is the visible consequences of her overt and covert actions which should tell us a story. What are the consequences of her being the unelected supreme authority in India since many years, one whose one word or glance can have innocent people teargassed and beaten up?
Well the first sign is the increase in terrorist onslaughts since she came to power; the 26/11 terror attacks and the inability of the Government to respond to them — on the spot, and later — are the best symbols of her presence at the top. There has also been a tremendous increase in Christian conversions since she came to power, a radicalisation of Islam in India and a galloping Westernisation, which is fast eradicating Indian culture in cities and major towns.
But to my mind, it is the attack on Hindu gurus, which is the most representative sign of her adharmic reign. For in Ms Gandhi's India, Hindu gurus are not only mocked at, but they can also be imprisoned, attacked, killed one day. Nobody would dare touch an imam if he preaches secession, nor even a Christian bishop, but gurus are fair game today.
Now Swami Ramdev, who incarnates an old tradition of spirituality in India, of all these gurus who throughout the ages have come to teach and preserve this ancient knowledge which takes the form of Hatha-yoga, Pranayama, Meditation or Ayurveda. Is he perfect? How to judge a guru, who is to grade them? Sri Aurobindo, in one of his aphorisms, said something like this: "Even if god were to manifest himself in front of thy very eyes, you would not recognise him." I am not able to judge Ramdev, but I can say with confidence that what he teaches is good, because it has benefited thousands of people.
Why then is he run down so much by the Congress whose leaders have gone as far as calling him a thug? Well it's an old British tradition which has been taken up by the Congress and part of the media. French historian DaniƩlou summed it up well in his History of India: "The British-controlled Congress utilised to the hilt its English-speaking Press to present the Hindu Mahashaba, which attempted to counterbalance the Muslim League's influence, or the even more maligned Ram Rajya Parishad, as barbaric, fanatical, ridiculous; and the British media in turn, took-up, as parrots, the cry of their Indian counterparts." (Histoire de l'Inde)
In the case of Swami Ramdev, there are also accusations of an 'empire' worth hundreds of crores and even an island. Well a guru has to decide: Either he stays in a cave and looks after his own salvation, or if he has come to help humanity, he will have first a few disciples, then a few hundreds, eventually thousands. He has to feed them, organise courses, satsangs, launch sewa projects. You need money for all that. Donations come, bigger and bigger, as the good work of this particular guru comes to be known. The funds have to be managed, more and more money is needed and gurus end up being like the head of a multinational corporation, with a hundred projects, all sewa-oriented, to manage. I have seen it at close hand.
The fact that Ramdev got manhandled is nothing new. Gurus come to save humanity, but men either mock them or even crucify them. That is also in the nature of things.
So who will win this battle of Kaliyuga? Sri Aurobindo came to announce the Supramental: He said that as there was man after the animal, so would there come a superman after man. Not the superman of the Hollywood series, but a man who is closer to beauty, love, compassion. One of the main attributes of the supermind, he stated, would be truth.
This is why at the moment in India, the magnifying glass of truth is put upon men and events and falsehood comes out in the form of the stupendous scams that have happened in the last few years.
Previously, the Congress was able to brazen it out, through bullying, deceit, lying and political cunning. Will it be able to do so this time? We have seen how it hopes that by slandering Ramdev and his very nice assistant, planting rumors, using the eternal scarecrow of the RSS (those old fuddy-fuddies, who most of the time could not harm a fly), it hopes to put a lid on all the suspicions which are hanging over their head.
For the first beneficiary of the 2G or the CWG scams, is not the DMK, but the Congress. They are the ones who have institutionalised political corruption, the bribing of parliamentarians and elections which cost hundred of crores to elect a single MP.
If truth does triumph, then Ms Gandhi's role will also come in the open, along with the truth about Italian middleman Ottavio Quattrocchi and the enormous covert funds the Congress is believed to be controlling. It may take time, but karma is inevitable. That is also an ancient Indian truth.
------------------------------
From: balakrishnan hariharan
| Ramdev eviction: Entering an era of semi-dictatorship |
----------
WHEN BEING A HINDU IS A BIGGER CRIME THAN BEING CORRUPT.
Dr. VSH wrote:
This battle against corruption has brought many things (suspected shakily earlier) now to the complete fore. Often one wonders about the deafening silence of both the Muslim and Christian leadership of this country regarding the current Mahaa_Yuddh against corruption.
Even speaking to many ordinary Christian and Muslims, one is profoundly shocked to see that for many of them Hinduism is a bigger anathema than corrupt forces. A Christian that I know openly told me that he would vote for the DMK any day even if they are corrupt to their rotten core but he will NEVER NEVER vote for any
party that is even remotely associated with Hinduism.
One is constantly taken aback by statements of even Hindus like Anna Hazaare who makes it a point that he is not even remotely associated with those that take genuine pride in their Hindu faith and the Hindu ethos of this land. The tragedy here is that even for many Hindus themselves (esp the pseculars and Congress/Bollywood crony Hindus), Hinduism is a bigger crime than corruption. If Hindus themselves hold such despicable views on their own faith, then what to say of staunch Christians and Muslims who don't even offer an inch towards reciprocal tolerance.
As any true Hindu who is pained at all this, one is confronted by many hurting questions..
1> Are patriotism and national welfare just the responsibility of Hindus??
2> Why are prominent Christians and Muslims of Bhaarath hesitant in sharing
the drivers seat in this battle against corruption
3> What has the fight against corruption got anything to do with Hinduism??
4> Why are Hindus finding themselves painted to a corner in this fight??
5> Where do the actual loyalties of the Christian and Muslim leadership lie??
6> Why is anything remotely connected to Hinduism is regarded as a curse by the media??
Why can't a Hindu protest against corruption from a Hindu platform??
7> Is being a Hindu a bigger crime than corruption??
At least one thing is for sure. We Hindus are really under seige by really
inimical forces who rank their hatred for our ethos even above their
dislike for corrupt forces. GOD ALONE SAVE US.
Dr. VSH
140611
When well intentioned Hindus call Hinduism a Faith, that is the only adds to the problems created by colonial past of being defensive on belonging o Dharma tradition.
-----------
No comments:
Post a Comment