Re: NavNirman - High Court might have directed an entry be made in the service record of Ranjit Singh Pankaj ( the UPCIC ) , had he not ben retired from IAS

Dear Urvashi
This is a bad taste matter for an IAS officer, who committed
contempt of court and reappointed as SCIC. There are lot of people in
the Govt., including the C.M., who want SCIC who are tainted IAS
officers. Good IAS officers never want any such posting.
Only God can save the Country
Regards
Dr JN Sharma

On 5/16/11, urvashi sharma <rtimahilamanchup@gmail.com> wrote:
> it is as if u involve in any irregular act n then either get urself
> transferred or get retired , u r not going to be touched for ur past
> misdeeds.
>
> which kind of a world is this we are living in .
>
> existing SCIC of Uttar Pradesh was Director Social welfare when he
> committed contempt of court. the court made harsh remarks but let
> panjaj go scotfree on the pretext that he has been retired from IAS.
>
> his working as SCIC does not attract any punishment for him for all
> the irregularities he earlier committed.
>
> this is the folloy of the system.
>
> a law-breaker is holding the highest post of watchdog of transparancy law in
> up.
>
> i shall try to meet governor and hand him over memo to remove pankaj
> taking suo motto cognizance of the court order.
>
> the court order is given below
>
> eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System
> (Judgment/Order in Text Format)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic
> copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake,
> please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).
>
>
> HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
>
> ?Court No. - 26
>
> Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11246 of 2006
>
> Petitioner :- Doodh Nath And Others
> Respondent :- Director, Directorate Social Welfare, U.P. And Others
> Petitioner Counsel :- Awadhesh Singh,Rameshwar Nath
> Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Jitendra Pal Singh,Sanjeev Kumar Yadav
>
> Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
> Affidavit filed by Shri Ranjit Singh Pankaj, Chief Information
> Commissioner is taken on record. He prays for and is granted a week's
> time to file reply.
> In view of the fact that the Director in the affidavit filed today,
> has admitted that a mistake has been committed and order has been
> passed in the teeth of judgement of the Division Bench of this Court
> in Special Appeal No. 445 of 1998, Special Appeal No. 446 of 1998 and
> Special Appeal No. 447 of 1998 decided on 23.1.2002 and that the
> mistake committed by him is not relevant or intentional.
> The presence of Shri Ranjit Singh Pankaj is exempted with a
> observation that in future such orders which virtually impact of
> overwriting the judgement of the High Court must not be passed and
> there should not be further occasion for this Court the complaint
> being made that the order of the High Court is being taken too
> lightly. This Court would have directed in the facts of the case, an
> entry be made in the service record of the Officer concerned but since
> he has retired such a direction is not being issued. This Court
> records that unhappiness in a manner in which the matter has been
> proceeded with.
> List on 19.4.2011.
> Order Date :- 5.4.2011
> Puspendra
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/StartWebSearch.do
> for more Judgments/Orders delivered at Allahabad High Court and Its
> Bench at Lucknow. Disclaimer
>
> --
> उर्वशी शर्मा
> "सूचना का अधिकार " हेल्पलाइन: 8081898081
> yaishwaryaj@gmail.com
>