Anti –Hindu Nehru and congress party would not allow Bhaarat to have Hindu identity of Bhaarat

Anti –Hindu Nehru and congress party would not allow Bhaarat to have Hindu identity of Bhaarat

 

The whole Nehru family was and is corrupt family. Nehru family has made the whole Bhaarat nation most corrupt country in the world. See the contribution of Nehru family and congress party in making politicians and general public corrupt people.

The most 10 corrupt politicians apart from Nehru family

http://in.lifestyle.yahoo.com/10-corrupt-indian-politicians-134933044.html

 

We are talking about the huge money. It is a plunder of the nation. It is a pure and simple theft of the national money. We are talking about mind-boggling crime.
       The scandals are bursting on to the front pages fast and thick. Suresh Kalmadi, a Congress Party politician and the former head of the corruption-plagued Commonwealth Games, was arrested April 25, 2011.
        According to a report by the Indian Comptroller and Auditor General, the 2G spectrum scam alone, in which 2G licenses were sold off in a manner that was, to say the least, less than transparent, cost close to $40 billion in lost revenue. Congress Party President Sonia Gandhi, currently #9 on Forbes list of the World's Most Powerful People, who is the actual Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh, is only #18. According to Forbes, "Gandhi remains the real power behind the nuclear-tipped throne [...] she has cemented her status as true heiress to the Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty."

Nehru and Congress Party would not allow Bhaarat to have her real Hindu identity and made Bhaarat the most corrupt country in the world.

        Dr. Swamy had made several allegations against Sonia Gandhi, including the claim that 60% of the 2G scam loot went to her two sisters.

       Dr. Swamy also alleged that Sonia Gandhi has benefited from Bofors, she has benefited from Iraq food for oil deal, she has been the recipient of the payoffs from the Russian KGB and that she has been maintaining secret bank accounts abroad. Dr. Swamy also claimed that Ms. Gandhi is also involved in the illegal export of the Bhaaratiya antiquities and Naveen Chawla's wife is involved in the scam too.

He also reminded that the Delhi High Court had earlier issued a notice to the CBI regarding the Bofors scam and that the spokesman of the successor organization of the KGB (FSI) had agreed to have given money to the Gandhi family because the whole family was friendly to them.

 

Hindu people used to be very honest in olden days. But congress government has made Bhaarat the most country in the world. For the honesty of Hindu people, please read the following report:

 

Here is an excerpt from the Lord Macaulay's speech in Kolkata (then Calcutta) on 2 February, 1835:

[Source: The Awakening Ray, vol.4, no.5, published by The Gnostic Center (USA)]

"I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation."

Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay (1800-1859), member of the governing council of the East India Company from 1834 to 1838, successfully advocated the replacement of the native languages (Persian, Arabic and Sanskrit) with English as the medium of education. He formulated his policy proposal in his Minute on Indian Education, delivered in Calcutta (Kolkata) on 2 February 1835. The Governor-General of India, William Bentinck, approved the proposal on 7 March 1835, so that it became the cornerstone of British-Indian educational policy until Independence (and remained largely in force after that as well).

At independence time of Bhaarat, in about 400 schools Sanskrit was taught, Nehru closed all schools where Sanskrit was taught. Please watch the following website.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN2iQOZ33BA

 

Nehru did not allow to settle Hindus in Kashmir by making article 370.

The constitutional exceptions for the non-Hindu majority state of Jammu & Kashmir (and likewise Nagaland and Mizoram) and the related expulsion of the near-total Hindu community from Kashmir in 1990 are due to Congress party politics.

                The absence of a Common Civil Code amounts to "pseudo-secularism", or indeed to a simple absence of secularism in the Personal Law dimension of the Indian state, would have to be acknowledged as more than just a Hindutva claim. It is something that Hindus of all kinds including those hostile to the Sangh, and people of all denominations, can see. By definition, a secular state is one that has its laws applying to its citizens regardless of their religion. The usual insistence that "Hindu nationalists want to abolish secularism" and its implication that the Indian state is indeed secular, cannot stand scrutiny on this score.

 

By making Hindu Endowment Act, took control of Hindu temples for looting wealth of Hindu temple while not touching Christian churches and Muslim mosques.

Nehru adopted Western model at every step in administration rather than adopting ancient Hindu model.

 

What unites Bhaarat?

Radha Rajan is a prolific and very nationalist writer. Her every article and speech should be translated in all Bhaaratiya languages and preached and spread on a very large scale in whole of Bhaarat and in other parts of the world.

 

In her article Multiculturalism is for Birds which were published in 4 parts, she expressed following views:

Hindu nation is formed on the basis of what unites us, what we have in common, while Abrahamic religionists fragment their countries into smaller countries and states on the basis of how they differ from each other.

Contrast the Abrahamic worldview with Hindu worldview –

- Dharma is supreme, even our gods are subject and subordinate to dharma

- Dharma can be embodied not only in gods but also in humans and non-humans

- A Hindu acquires his worldview not from understanding time, space and the cosmos first (western science and philosophy) and then place the individual within this understanding, but by knowing the nature of the individual first and proceeding from that to understand the nature of the rest of the world – time, space, and cosmos

- The journey within the self and from the self to the world is a Hindu's religion, his spirituality

- God (devas) is the name Hindus give to the extraordinary power, intelligence which permeates all creation

- Because this power, this intelligence (god) is already present, already permeates the world, Hindus do not have to be in a constant state of war with the world to bring any nation or kingdom under the control of our devas

- There are as many gods as there are humans and as many layers of understanding the truth that every god, every method to know the truth, so long as it is subjected to and governed by dharma, is legitimate and deserving of respect

- Wars were waged by kings to establish dharma and the victorious king had to be a dharma vijayi and not a lobha (plunder) or asura vijayi (rape, plunder, murder, mayhem and destruction)

- Within the Hindu nation, Hindus who worshipped Shiva or Vishnu, Kali or Aiyanar, mountain or river, stick or stone or his parents, even if he chose not to worship anyone or anything (that itself indicated simply one level of understanding and he would be born again and again until the fruits of his karma enabled him to know the nature of the self; after that words like belief or non-belief become redundant) could all live together without killing in the name of their god because everything was god and godly when the worshipper was ruled by dharma

- When people lived by dharma and were ruled by dharma, there were no multi-cultures as the Abrahamic world understands the word; there was only one worldview and all creative expressions proceeding from this worldview was culture.

It is this stubborn foolishness which made Mohandas Karam Chand Gandhi think that Hindus and Muslims, Hindus and Christians in India are brothers because they have the same ancestors. Gandhi should have read the Bible and the Koran with political sense to grasp the political objectives of both books of revelation. Both books declare a brother is he who worships the same god; if your blood brother worships another god, he is an infidel; convert him or kill him. Gandhi had no such political sense and Nehru was an irreligious man; and that is why the Hindu nation Bhaarat, governed by the Gandhi-Nehru INC, is destined to be enslaved by Gandhian sense of the nation –

- If Hindus believe India should be peopled only by Hindus, they are living in a fool's paradise. Hindus, Muslims, Parsis, and Christians who have made India their home are fellow countrymen; they will have to live in unity if only for their own infests. In no part of the world are one nationality and one religion synonymous terms, nor has this ever been the case in India. (Hind Swaraj, Chapter X, The Condition of India (cont.): The Hindus and the Mahomedans, pp 52-53)

Savarkar on the other hand suffered from no such delusions –

- As it is, there are two antagonistic nations living side by side in India, several infantile politicians commit the serious mistake in supposing that India is already welded into a harmonious nation, or that it could be welded thus for the mere wish to do so. Our well-meaning but unthinking friends take their dreams for realities… The solid fact is that the so-called communal questions are but a legacy handed down to us by centuries of a cultural, religious and national antagonism between the Hindus and the Moslems. When time is ripe you can solve them but you cannot suppress them by merely refusing recognition of them. (Savarkar's Presidential address to the 19th session of the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha at Karnavati (Ahmedabad) in 1937)

            If you knew that nature has granted you enormous talents, what would you do with your life? Would you try to become the next Steve Jobs, the man who brought us IPhones, IPads and other marvels that changed the way we live? Or would you rather become Business management personnel and work the financial magic that allows you to slather yourself in wealth, bringing every material wish within your easy reach. Or would you consider becoming a politician?

            Judging by what we see in Bhaarat or around the world, the truly talented people of the last generation have shunned careers in politics. In the face of an avalanche of major global challenges, what one sees at the top is a stunning absence of strong, credible and effective leadership. Despite the transformative power of the uprisings, no strong and credible leaders have emerged to guide Bhaarat into future. The great danger this talented leadership vacuum is that it opens the way for the wrong kind of charismatic individuals to gain political traction. At present time, Bhaarat needs top talent to face daunting problems. The top rungs of power seem populated by people who not only fail to inspire, but fail to come up with creative solutions of the problems of Bhaarat. All the politicians despite their valiant efforts, they all seem much smaller than the problems. It is time when all Bhaaratiya people need more talent people who rule Bhaarat.  

            In this time of crisis people have to uncover the hidden mettle, character of our current corrupt leaders. Under such a conditions, may be someone with great talents surprise us, reminding us that beyond the riches and glory of working at high paid wages, the world of politics desperately needs some good men and women who can make a real difference.

If India is body, Hindutva is its soul. Body and soul are inseparable. When the soul departs body becomes dead. Sonia, Nehru Gandhi family and congress party people are trying that soul leaves the body as nobody can kill soul, so that body (Bhaarat) becomes dead for them to devour.

Dr. Subramanian Swamy is trying to expose the corruption of Sonia Gandhi and congress party. Therefore congress leaders have become abusive for Dr. Subramanian Swamy by saying he is against Muslims and Christians.

I cannot understand how anyone can call Dr. Subramanian Swamy a BIGOT. Dr. Swamy's brother-in-law is Jewish, his son-in-law Muslim, his sister-in-law Christian and his wife Parsi. One of his two daughters is married to an Indian Muslim with whom he has closest relations, and therefore how can he possibly be a bigot against the Indian Muslims or Christians.