Fwd: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P. Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:27:44 +0530
Subject: Re: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to
information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P.
Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
To: acph-rb@rb.nic.in, urgent-action@ohchr.org, hgovup@up.nic.in

Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind
attention of Hon'ble Sir towards following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
neither district judge nor his representative appeared before the
U.P.S.I.C. on 19 october 2011. 2-It is
submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that again neither district judge nor
his representative appeared before U.P.S.I.C. on 11 january 2012.
3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
U.P.S.I.C. fixed 11 april 2012 as the next date of hearing of the
case. 4--It is submitted before the
Hon'ble Sir that hearing of the complaint is taking place since more
than one year. Unfortunately district judge Mirzapur could not provide
sought information to your applicant which has been withheld on filmsy
ground. 5-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that in
india rule of law means if you are influencial then quasijudicial
proceedings and judicial proceedings have no meaning for you. If you
are ordinary man, then even application based on forged documents will
cause court to summon you and suffer trial for many years.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir to
pass appropriate directive so that your applicant could get sought
information and faith in law of land may become more stronger and its
safeguarding institution. For this your applicant shall ever pray you
Hon'ble Sir. Yours Sincerely.
Yogi M. P. Singh

On 1/8/12, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to
> draw the kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards following submissions
> as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble
> Sir that India is a member country of U.N.O. Whether provision of
> U.D.H.R. ie its article 8. (Every has right to an effective remedy by
> the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental
> rights granted by the constitution or by law.) is binding in India or
> not. Why delay by district judge in furnishing acces to information
> even after repeated direction of U.P.S.I.C. 2-It is submitted before
> the Hon'ble Sir that according to article 7 of U.D.H.R. All are equal
> before law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal
> protection of law. All are entitled to equal protection against any
> discrimination in violation of this declaration and against any
> incitement to such discrimination. Your applicant was performing only
> his fundamental duties specified in constitution under article 51 A
> and complaint filed against him was only to wreak vengience. Why a
> whistle blower is being prosecuted on the basis of manipulated
> documents? Why district judge, Mirzapur is not complying the direction
> of U.P.S.I.C.? Why U.P.S.I.C. is not awarding penaly to district judge
> Mirzapur for disobeying its order? This is humble request of your
> applicant to direct appropriate authority to made available the
> information in accordance with law. For this your applicant shall ever
> pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely. Yogi M. P. Singh
> Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:51:02 +0530
> Subject: Fwd: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to
> information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P.
> Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
> To: csup@up.nic.in
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:49:37 +0530
> Subject: Fwd: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to
> information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P.
> Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
> To: hgovup@up.nic.in
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:47:51 +0530
> Subject: Fwd: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to
> information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P.
> Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
> To: shaileshgandhi@nic.in
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:44:05 +0530
> Subject: Fwd: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to
> information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P.
> Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
> To: secypg@nic.in
>
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to
> inform you Hon'ble Sir that neither CPIO nor any representative of
> district judge Mirzapur attended the proceedings of U.P.S.I.C. dated
> 19 otober 2011 and sought information is still awaited from district
> judge Mirzapur. Next date of hearing has been fixed on 11 january
> 2012. Here this question arises that why district judge Mirzapur is
> undermining the authority of state information commission of Uttar
> Pradesh? It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that in leading daily
> "The Times of India New Delhi" a news item was published on 25
> December 2003 titled Court has to give reasons for verdict. News has
> been quoted as follows. In a major judgment, the Supreme Cour
> has held that "failure to give reasons(by a court) amounts to denial
> of justice. Earlier, the court had held that nor only does
> delayed justice amount to justice denied, but delayed judgment also
> amounts to justice being denied. Faced with numerous
> cryptic judgements and orders passed by various Highcourts giving no
> reason for their decision to either reject or accept the arguements of
> either of the parties involved in a case, the apex court said "Right
> to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system." This
> judgement was delivered by Hon'ble division bench of justice
> Doraiswami Raju and justice Arijit Pasayat. Recalling
> the Lord Denning's words, the bech said:"The giving of reasons is one
> of fundamentals of good administration." It referred to another
> judgement by a Londan court saying "Failure to give reasons amounts to
> denial of justice." The bench further said : "Reasons are live
> links between the mind of the decision or conclusion arrived at.
> Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity." This
> is humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir to take
> appropriate action in accordance with law as you Hon'ble Sir deem fit.
> For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours
> Sincerely. Yogi M. P. Singh.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:53:03 +0530
> Subject: Fwd: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to
> information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P.
> Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
> To: ddpg2-arpg@nic.in
>
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect please take a glance of on
> line filed grievance which registration no. is DEPOJ/E/2011/00156
> Name of complainant- Yogi M. P. Singh, date of receipt- 14may2011,
> Received by department of justice, officer's name- Mr R. K. Agrawal,
> officer' designation- Deputy Secretary H.C. and Justice , contact
> address- R. No. 12 Jaisalmer House, Mansingh Road, New Delhi 110011,
> contact no. 23073178 , current status -received the grievance.
> It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that maximum time taken in
> redressal of grievance filed on line is 90 days. Unfortunately
> aforesaid grievance filed on line is still awaiting action . It
> is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that this E-mail may be made
> avalable to concerned as more feedback in order to redressal of
> grievance. This is humble request of your applicant to
> you Hon'ble Sir to take steps as required by law. For this your
> applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely Yogi
> M. P. Singh
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:46:17 +0530
> Subject: Fwd: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to
> information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P.
> Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
> To: hgovup@up.nic.in
>
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect, your applicant wants draw the
> kind attention of you Hon'ble Sir that in our constitution ,every one
> is alike before law then why district judge is undermining the
> authority of Hon'ble U.P.S.I.C. by not attending the process of
> commission subsequently . Ipsofacto obvious that rules are only made
> for poor besides influencials in case don't follow then they have
> automatic immunity from suits and legal processes. What is the rule of
> law ? each one has its own definition. Hon'ble Sir your applicant is a
> whistle blower and concerned are hatching conspiracy to harass me. A
> fabricated case has been instituted against your applicant on the
> basis of forged documents. Your applicant is only trying to expose
> such manipulators in the interest of justice. Hon'ble Sir may be
> pleased to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. For this
> your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerly
> Yogi M. P . Singh
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:11:56 +0530
> Subject: Re: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to
> information as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P.
> Singh Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
> To: secypg@nic.in
>
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicnt wants to apprise you
> Hon'ble Sir on the fixed date of hearing before U.P.S.I.C. ie on 3
> august 2011 neither representative of district judge Mirzapur nor he
> himself appeared for representation. Hon'ble commission fixed 19
> october 2011 as the next date of hearing. Here this question arises
> that why district judge Mirzapur is undrmining the authority of
> U.P.S.I.C. ? Why district judge Mirzapur , adopted lackadaisical
> approach towards the direction of U.P.S.I.C. as ipsofacto obvious ?
> Hon'ble Sir please take appropriate step regarding the matter in
> accordance with law. For this your applcant shall ever pray you
> Hon'ble Sir.
>
> On 7/24/11, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:55:08 +0530
>> Subject: District Judge Mirzapur did not furnish access to information
>> as sought through letter dated 4.10.2009 by Yogi M.P. Singh
>> Moh-Surekapuram,Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh.
>> To: hgovup@up.nic.in
>>
>> Hon'ble Sir. I sought following point wise informations under
>> subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005. 1- Hon'ble Sir
>> may direct P.I.O. to made available access to information that howmuch
>> time is given to any authority to comply the order of hon'ble court as
>> there has been more than one year since the date 12.6.2008 on which
>> day court issued order to summon original copy of enquiry report and
>> letter of nomination of enquiry officer. 2-To direct P.I.O. to
>> made available access to information whether a bureaucrat can defy the
>> order of hon'ble court in such a way. Whether court will take
>> cognizance of matter or not which is lowering the dignity of hon'ble
>> court as D.P.R.O. Mirzapur only submitted photocopy of of aforesaid
>> papers after repeated reminders from A.C.J.M. Court mirzapur.
>> 3-To direct P.I.O. made available copy of letter dated
>> 28.8.2006of Yogi M. P. Singh as one of six papers submitted by learned
>> counsel for petitioner gone missing from paper book in order to defend
>> complaint filed against applicant on filmsy ground. 4-To
>> direct P.I.O. to furnish access to information to applicant whether
>> hon'ble court will take the cognizance of letters as enquiry officer
>> repeatedly accepted through these letters that he was nominated by
>> D.M. Mirzapur on 31.5.2006 as enquiry officer and said date has been
>> manipulated to 31.5.2007. Also sought information whether those
>> committed forgery with the record of court would be prosecuted and
>> punished or not. When applicant was not made available
>> information even after the direction of P.M.O. India , chief
>> secretary, chief minister office,and department of justice of
>> government of uttar pradesh,then applicant filed an appeal under
>> subsection 3 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005 dated 21.6.2010.
>> Applicant submitted the supplementary to the second appeal on
>> 5.9.2010. Which was received by clerk of district court 8.12.2010 in
>> order to comply the directive of U.P.S.I.C. by the applicant on first
>> day of hearing of complaint in U.P.S.I.C. The appeal was listed for
>> hearing on 5.1.2011, 9.2.2011. On 9.2.2011 hon,ble commission
>> decided that proceedings would move ahead only after the cosultations
>> with law experts. Next date for hearing was fixed on 16.3.2011 but no
>> information was made available. Next hearing dated 8.6.2011 was not
>> attended by any one on behalf of C.P.I.O. Again 3.8.2011 has been
>> fixed as next date of hearing of complaint before U.P.S.I.C.
>>
>