Fwd: To take action on the letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed to Hon'ble Prime Minister of India sent by - Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:25:30 +0530
Subject: Fwd: To take action on the letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed
to Hon'ble Prime Minister of India sent by - Yogi M. P. Singh
Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)
To: hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, cmup@up.nic.in,
pmosb@pmo.nic.in, acph-rb@rb.nic.in

Hon'ble Sir. With due respect , I am reminding to Hon'ble Sir
that now new government has been installed in the state of uttar
pradesh and now in the light of more forgery in the matter made it
compulsory that matter be investigated by an enquiry committee
appointed at state level. Earlier concerned authority has made the
mockery of law of land and manipulated public records like a child cut
the solutions when it goes wrong, at the primary level. Previous
government never maintaind the sanctity of public documents in order
to establish the credibility in public domain.
This is my humble request to you Hon'ble Sir to direct appropriate
agency to enquire into the matter and book those who hatched
conspiracy to manipulate the public documents deliberately. For this
your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely.
Yogi M. P. Singh Mob. 9336252631

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:42:11 +0530
Subject: Re: To take action on the letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed to
Hon'ble Prime Minister of India sent by - Yogi M. P. Singh
Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)
To: drda-mir@nic.in

Hon'ble Sir. No action was taken on the submission which will
encourage the embezzlement of public fund. Yours
sincerely. Yogi M. P. Singh.

On 10/31/11, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:17:55 +0530
> Subject: Fwd: To take action on the letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed
> to Hon'ble Prime Minister of India sent by - Yogi M. P. Singh
> Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)
> To: crd-up@nic.in
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:39:39 +0530
> Subject: Re: To take action on the letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed to
> Hon'ble Prime Minister of India sent by - Yogi M. P. Singh
> Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)
> To: secypg@nic.in
>
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw
> kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards following submissions regarding
> the letter of B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur letter
> no.481/est.clerk/RTI/2011-2012 dated 9.9.2011 addressed to your
> applicant which was received at 2 PM today from post man, in order to
> reply the letter of your applicant dated 29.7.2011 submitted before
> C.D.O. Mirzapur to apprise him how B.D.O. Chhanbey is trying to
> conceal the misdeeds by manipulating and additional entry in documents
> in order to respond the letter of your applicant dated 20.2.2011.
> addressed to Hon'ble Prime Minister of india. 1- It is submitted
> before the Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chanbey under point 1 quotes that
> please take the notice of your application dated 18.1.2009 para 1 in
> which you have written "Please inform the applicant how much
> Government fund has been (written in bold) spent in the said garam
> panchayat whether it may be in the form of hard cash or food grain
> under the plantation scheme." In this para you have
> neither stated any specific government scheme for plantation nor
> specific financial year for which information you need. In the above
> para "has been"(written in bold) (present perfect continuous tense)
> refers to financial year 2008-09 according to your application. Since
> plantation scheme was under taken only in the year 2006-07 under
> NREGA. Therefore the information nearest to financial year 2008-09
> available at the block level was provided to you. It is
> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that aforesaid sentence is passive
> voice of present perfect tense which means, please made available
> information from the plantation scheme initiatiation to the date of
> filing RTI Communique. It has no meaning that under what name or under
> which government scheme plantation is being carried out.
> 2- It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that under point 2 B.D.O.
> Chanbey quotes that take a glance of letter no.1102 dated 20.3.2009
> sent by B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur. In para 2 it is clearly stated that
> -estimate and other details are available if you really need that you
> have to submit Rs 45. 00 through D.D. in the gram nidhi account.
> It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O.
> Chhanbey is overcoming my tension since more than two and half years
> even when matter is being heard by U.P.S.I.C. since more than one and
> half years and on the last date of hearing on 3 august 2011 Hon'ble
> commissioner told your applicant that after repeated summons D.D.O.
> Mirzapur did not appear before commision so commission imposes penalty
> of Rs. 25000. 00. Why B.D.O. Chhanbey is being allowed to take
> decisions on matter when he is acting like stumbling block since
> begining. 3- It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that under
> point 3 B.D.O. Chhanbey quotes that it is to inform you that prior
> NREGA the documents of construction works undertaken by gram
> panchayats were kept at the same level, but in NREGA the documents of
> construction works undertaken by gram panchayats are kept at both
> the levels -gram panchayat as well as block level. Since plantation
> work undertaken by the gram panchayat in the financial year 2005-06 is
> of different scheme and documents of that scheme are not kept at block
> level. The information provided to you is according to the documents
> available at the block level. It is
> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey first does not
> comply the direction of senior authorities then manipulate the
> documents and now claiming that all the documents are not in
> possession of B.D.O. 4- It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
> under point 4 B.D.O. Chhanbey quotes that no direction of any kind is
> required because all the documents are well audited. Consequently
> there is no room for misappropriation of of either documents or of
> funds. It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
> B.D.O. has no moral right to articulate as such till he is not
> responding RTI Communique concerned with the reply of B.D.O. in
> respect of your applicant's letter dated 20.2.2011 in which B.D.O.
> Chhanbey attached some tempered documents. This is humble request
> to direct appropriate authority in accordance with law. For this your
> applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely Yogi
> M. P. Singh
>
> On 9/14/11, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect Your applicant wants to draw
>> the kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards the letter of C.D.O.
>> Mirzapur Mr. B. Ram letter no. 292 dated 3 september 2011 wrote to
>> B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur as follows. Please take the
>> perusal of letter of office of P.I.O./Deputy Commissioner rural
>> development, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow letter no. 4216/mgnrega
>> nrega-cell/RTI/11 dated 29.8.2011. With which a letter of M/O RURAL
>> DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA letter no. J-14036/45/2010 dated
>> 21.7.2011 as an attachment letter of Yogi M. P. Singh, Surekapuram,
>> Jabalpur Road, Mirzapur dated 20.2.2011 under R.T.I. Act 2005
>> concerned with seeking to made available point-wise information, is
>> att attached with the letter. Cosequently B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur
>> was directed by C.D.O. Mirzapur to made available sought information
>> immediately. Thus aforesaid letter being attached with this
>> letter is being sent to you with the direction that sought information
>> through the annexed letter be made available to YOGI M. P. SINGH
>> within specified time. Besides this a copy be made available to
>> D.R.D.A. office so that reports may be made available to P.I.O./Deputy
>> Commissioner rural development timely. You have already been directed
>> through letter to made available information. It is submitted
>> before the Hon'ble Sir that copy of the aforementioned letter was sent
>> to Your applicant, Deputy Commissioner, rural development,mnrega cell,
>> lucknow and D.M. Mirzapur. It is submitted before
>> the Hon'ble Sir that in the corner of aforesaid letter noting was made
>> most important/even today but unfortunately today is 14.9.2011. Your
>> applicant is only making efforts constantly in order to get proper
>> response of letter dated 20.2.2011. This is humble
>> request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir to direct appropriate
>> authority not to shield accused by only making procrastinating efforts
>> as ipsofacto obvious from lackadaisical approach of authorities
>> concerned. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir.
>> Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:02:21 +0530
>> Subject: Fwd: To take action on the letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed
>> to Hon'ble Prime Minister of India sent by - Yogi M. P. Singh
>> Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)
>> To: shaileshgandhi@nic.in
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:59:33 +0530
>> Subject: Fwd: To take action on the letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed
>> to Hon'ble Prime Minister of India sent by - Yogi M. P. Singh
>> Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)
>> To: s.mishra@nic.in
>>
>> An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005.
>> To Hon'ble Chief Information Commissioner of India
>> /companion commissioners, New Delhi Subject-To direct
>> C.P.I.O. MGNREGA Dn. MoRD to made available complete point-wise
>> information as sought through the letter dated 28.5.2011 under
>> subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 by your complainant.
>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your complainant wants to
>> draw kind attention of you Hon'ble Sir towards following submissions
>> as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble
>> Sir that when Under Secretary &CPIO(MGNREGA Dn) Mr Dhananjay Kumar
>> did not furnish access to information as sought by your complainant
>> through letter petition dated 28.5.2011 under subsection 1 of section
>> 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 within time specified under subsection 1 of
>> section 7 of R.T.I. Act 2005 then your complainant filed an appeal
>> under subsection 1 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005 dated 9.7.2011
>> addressed to Secretary, M/O Rural Development, Government of India,
>> New Delhi to direct first appellate authority of the department to
>> consider my first appeal in accordance with the provisions of R.T.I.
>> Act 2005. 2- It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
>> Under Secretary &CPIO(MGNREGA Dn)through its letter F. No.
>> L-12060/92/2011/R.T.I./MGNREGA/BKS Dated 25.7.2011 which subject is
>> as (Your RTI application dated 28th june 2011(june was mistakenly
>> written at the place of may) seeking status of earlier letter dated
>> 20.2.2011 forwarded to this Ministry vide PMO's letter dated 8.4.2011)
>> furnished only that application dated 20.2.2011 received in the
>> complaint cell was forwarded to the state government for examination
>> and submitting action taken report vide letter dated 26.4.2011. A
>> communication has also been issued to the state government on
>> 21.7.2011 for expediting the action taken report in the matter. Copy
>> of letters dated 26.4.2011 and 21.7.2011 and copy of notesheet dated
>> 26.4.2011 are enclosed. It is unfortunate that CPIO violated the
>> provisions of subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act 2005 but neither
>> CPIO nor F.A.A. made regret on this delay. 3- It is
>> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that F.A.A. in its order dated
>> 8.8.2011 only blindly supported the stand of CPIO without taking the
>> perusal of RTI communique under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I.
>> Act 2005 dated 28.5.2011. 4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir
>> that under transparency act, CPIO has to furnish point-wise
>> information as sought by your applicant and by providing only status
>> of letter 20.2.2011as ipsofacto obvious he acted against the letters
>> and spirit of transparency law. This is humble request of your
>> complainant to you Hon'ble Sir to pass an an appropriate order in
>> accordance with the law. For this your complainant shall ever pray you
>> Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:49:33 +0530
>> Subject: Re: To take action on the letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed to
>> Hon'ble Prime Minister of India sent by - Yogi M. P. Singh
>> Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)
>> To: secypg@nic.in
>>
>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect please take a glance of your
>> applicant's application dated 28.7.2011 under subsection 1 of section
>> 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 submitted before C.D.O. Mirzapur. Subject-To
>> direct P.I.O. of the department to made available information seeking
>> point-wise within time stipulated under subsection 1 of section 7 of
>> R.T.I. Act 2005. Hon'ble Sir. With due
>> respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of Hon'ble Sir
>> towards following submissions. 1-It is submitted before
>> the Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey sent communication dated 4.7.2011
>> addressed to C.D.O. Mirzapur letter no. 271/stha./R.T.I./2011-12 which
>> was received by your applicant on 28.7.2011 ie just today containing
>> two work completion certificate (photo-copy) as enclosures. Your
>> applicant is sending these photo copies with this application. Please
>> direct P.I.O. of the department to made available attested copy of
>> these photo copies. 2-Please direct P.I.O. to
>> made available the name and designation of the employee who made
>> entries dated 15.10.2006, 4.11.2007,4.11.2007 in the aforesaid photo
>> copies. Who did the payment. Please made available the payment sheet.
>> Please made available sought information before
>> 3-august-2011 if possible. For this your applicant shall ever pray you
>> Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-Surekapuram,
>> Jabalpur Road, Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.) DATED-28-7-2011
>> IT IS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE SIR THAT HERE IN SOUGHT
>> INFORMATION IS STILL AWAITED. To Hon'ble Chief
>> Development Officer Dist-Mirzapur Subject-To draw the kind
>> attention of C.D.O. Mirzapur on misleading points in respect of
>> submissions of B.D.O. Chhanbey submitted through its letter
>> 271/stha./R.T.I./2011-12 Dated 4.7.2011 which copy was also served to
>> your applicant through registered post, received on 28.7.2011 Hon'ble
>> Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind
>> attention of the Hon'ble Sir towards following submissions as follows.
>> 1- It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
>> B.D.O. Chhanbey in para 1 mentioned that your applicant sought how
>> much money was spent under M.N.R.E.G.A. for tree plantation is
>> misleading as your applicant did not mention at any place in his
>> letter dated 18.1.2009 word MNREGA but sought how much government fund
>> has been spent in the gram panchayat-NIBI GAHARWAR whether it may be
>> in the the form of hard cash or food grain under the tree plantation
>> scheme. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 1
>> in three pages. 2- It is submitted before the
>> Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey affirmed in its letter that only in
>> the financial year 2006-07 Rs 4700. 00 was spent under the tree
>> plantation scheme. At present he is again confusing that said amount
>> was only used to buy infant (small) plants for plantation. Whether
>> looking after of the plants , labour charge in plantation and
>> safeguards of plants do not include the fund meant for tree plantation
>> scheme. Whether B.D.O. Chhanbey understood these facts five years
>> later ie aggregated all the spent money five years later by making
>> illegal entries. 3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir
>> that in the gram panchayat-NIBI Gaharwar Block-CHHANBEY in the
>> financial year 2005-06 Rs23300. 00 spent under plantation scheme from
>> complete rural employment fund which proves the claim of B.D.O.
>> Chhanbey wrong that no money spent in the other financial years except
>> 2006-07 now it is 2007-08. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the
>> perusal of annexure 2 made available by D.P.R.O. Mirzapur.
>> 4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey
>> may be directed not to connect this fund spent in the financial year
>> 2005-06 to the financial year 2007-08 by using tactics but maintain
>> sanctity of the records. Please take appropriate steps in
>> accordance with law. For this your applicant shall ever pray you
>> Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-Surekapuram,
>> Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.) DATED-29.7.2011
>> IT IS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE SIR THAT ACTION ON AFORESAID
>> LETTER STILL AWAITED.
>>
>> On 9/3/11, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to
>>> apprise you Hon'ble Sir that your applicant submitted an application
>>> dated 28.5.2011 before SECRETARY M/O RURAL DEVELOPMENT , GOVERNMENT OF
>>> INDIA, NEW DELHI under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005.
>>> The subject of the foresaid applcation is
>>> undermentioned. To direct P.I.O. of the department to made
>>> avilable point-wise information in respect of letter PMO ID No.
>>> 10/3/2011-PMP-3/269196 dated 8.4.2011 as sought below within time
>>> specified under subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act 2005. The copy
>>> of the letter is annexed with this application as annexure 1.
>>> Submitted submissions and sought information are as follows.
>>> 1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your applicant's letter
>>> dated 20.2.2011 was forwarded to you Hon'ble Sir for action as
>>> appropriate with covering letter of P.M.O. dated 8.4.2011. Hon'ble Sir
>>> may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 1. Hon'ble Sir may be
>>> pleased to direct P.I.O. of the department to made available following
>>> informations. 1- A -What action you Hon'ble Sir have taken
>>> on the aforesaid letter? 1-B- Please made
>>> available the certified noting on the aforesaid letter. 2- It
>>> is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that Hon'ble P.M.O. made available
>>> information in reference to your applicant's letter dated 25.3.2011
>>> under R.T.I. Act 2005 that action on the part of this office is
>>> complete with the forwarding of the matter to the authority concerned.
>>> Applicant may contact the authority concerned for further information.
>>> A copy of the forwarding letter is also endorsed to the applicant for
>>> contacting the authority concerned. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to
>>> direct P.I.O. to made available following informations.
>>> 2-A- Whether the action on the part of the office is complete or not.
>>> If complete , then made available action taken report. 2-B-If matter
>>> was again forwarded to the next, then why copy of forwarding note was
>>> not endorsed to your applicant? 2-C- As the matter is
>>> concerned with the misappropriation of public fund consequently
>>> whether the department will sortout the matter on priority basis or
>>> not. This is humble request to you Hon'ble Sir to pass an appropriate
>>> order in accordance with the provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005. For this
>>> your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely
>>> Yogi M. P. Singh Moh- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur
>>> (U.P.) DATED 28.5.2011
>>>
>>> On 9/1/11, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect, please take the perusal of
>>>> rest of submissions. 9- It is submitted before the
>>>> Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey took under teeth the letters of
>>>> P.M.O. , Chief Secretary's Office, Chief Minister's Office as well as
>>>> concerned ministry . Here this question arises that whether B.D.O.
>>>> Chhanbey is above the law and why is he not complying the directions
>>>> of senior authorities? In view of your applicant B.D.O. Chhanbey ranks
>>>> at bottom in the administrative hierarchy but how is he considering
>>>> like schizophrenic way for himself to the top and defying the order of
>>>> his seniors? Which is an important question, can be responded well by
>>>> a senior most authority of government of uttar pradesh. This is
>>>> humble request of your applicant to Hon'ble Sir to pass an appropriate
>>>> direction in accordance with law. For this your applicant shall ever
>>>> pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh
>>>> dated-20.2.2011 It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
>>>> P.M.O. forwarded the aforesaid letter with covering note PMO ID No.
>>>> 10/3/2011-PMP3/269196 dated 8.4.2011 to SECRETARY, M/O RURAL
>>>> DEVELOPMENT Subject is as follows. LETTER OF Sh. YOGI M P
>>>> SINGH MOHALLA-SUREKAPURAM, JABALPUR ROAD, MIRZAPUR , U.P. A
>>>> letter dated 20.2.2011 received in this office from Sh. YOGI M P SINGH
>>>> is forwarded herewith for action as appropriate. ( RITU SHARMA )
>>>> SECTION OFFICER Copy for information made available to your
>>>> applicant.
>>>>
>>>> On 9/1/11, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw
>>>>> kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards submissions of aforesaid letter
>>>>> in which your applicant requested to direct Government of Uttar
>>>>> Pradesh to establish rule of law in its administrative function and no
>>>>> one may be allowed to take law under teeth. 1-It is submitted before
>>>>> the Hon'ble Sir that B. D. O. Chhanbey Dist-Mirzapur informed your
>>>>> applicant through its letter no. 948/estclerk /R.T.I./2008-09 dated
>>>>> 7.2.2009 that in the gram panchayat-Nibi Gaharwar under N.R.E.G.A.
>>>>> Rs4700.00(four thousand seven hundred only)has been spent for the
>>>>> plantation in the financial year2006-2007. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased
>>>>> to take the perusal of annexure 1. 2-It is submitted before the
>>>>> Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey , Mirzapur again informed your
>>>>> applicant through its letter no. 1102/est.clerk/R.T.I./2008-09 dated
>>>>> 20.3.2009 that earlier it was stated that under N.R.E.G.A. Rs 4700. 00
>>>>> (four thousand seven hundred only ) has been spent in gram panchayat
>>>>> -Nibi Gaharwar in the financial year 2006-2007.
>>>>> As well as B.D.O. Chhanbey also affirmed that for your kind
>>>>> information under N.R.E.G.A. plantation was undertaken by the said
>>>>> gram panchayat-Nibi Gaharwar only in 2006-07. Prior and after this
>>>>> financial year this scheme was not undertaken. Hon'ble Sir may be
>>>>> pleased to take a glance of annexure 2 . 3-It is submitted before the
>>>>> Hon'ble Sir that D.P.R.O. Mirzapur had made available information
>>>>> concerned with the fund spent to carryout developmental activities in
>>>>> the gram panchayat-Nibi Gaharwar up to 30.8.2008 in which it was
>>>>> expressed obviously that Rs 50419. 00(fifty thousand four hundred
>>>>> nineteen) spent for the plantation under N.R.E.G.A. in the financial
>>>>> year 2007-2008. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take a perusal of
>>>>> annexure 3. 4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that apparently
>>>>> from the earlier submissions ipsofacto obvious that there is no
>>>>> relevancy between developmental works performed in the aforesaid gram
>>>>> panchayat and reports made available to monitoring bodies. Here this
>>>>> question arises that why there is disparity in the records of the
>>>>> department ? Hon'ble Sir when the record of secretary of the village
>>>>> differs from the record of B.D.O. Chhanbey by the appreciable amount
>>>>> Rs 50419. 00 in reference to only one scheme, then what happens with
>>>>> the district administration and state secretariat. Here it is obvious
>>>>> that such practice has been tradition in respect of administrative
>>>>> function of state government. Otherwise any action was taken against
>>>>> such errant public servants who are running paper in respect of
>>>>> developmental works. 5-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
>>>>> C.D.O. Mirzapur in its letter no. 3975/stha-3/R.T.I./2009-10 dated
>>>>> 28.1.2010 directed B.D.O. Chhanbey , Mirzapur to made available action
>>>>> taken to your applicant as well as C.D.O. Mirzapur took strong
>>>>> exception of not furnishing approval to take punitive action against
>>>>> against accused employee. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance
>>>>> of annexure 4. 6-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that D.D.O.
>>>>> Mirzapur through its letter no. 4702 dated 19.3.2010 directed B.D.O.
>>>>> Chhanbey, Mirzapur to take the reference of letter 3975 dated
>>>>> 28.1.2010 in which approval was sought to take the punitive action
>>>>> against accused employee. B.D.O. Chhanbey was again directed by D.D.O.
>>>>> Mirzapur to take action in the aforesaid matter as directed and made
>>>>> available action taken to your applicant. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased
>>>>> to take a glance of annexure 5. 7- It is submitted
>>>>> before the Hon'ble Sir that D.D.O. Mirzapur through its letter dated
>>>>> 19.5.2010 letter no. 926 directed B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur to take
>>>>> the perusal of annexure ie letter no. 149 dated 5.5.2010 in which
>>>>> P.I.O. Collectorate forwarded the letter of Yogi M. P. Singh with
>>>>> direction to made available information desired. Hon'ble Sir may be
>>>>> pleased to take a glance of annexure 6. 8-It is submitted before the
>>>>> Hon'ble Sir that D.D.O. Mirzapur again directed B.D.O. Chhanbey ,
>>>>> Mirzapur through its letter 1263/R.T.I./2010-11 dated 8.6.2010 that
>>>>> please take the perusal of letter PI-111/38-7-10-11(R.T.I.)/2010 dated
>>>>> 14.5. 2010 in which under secretary Rural Development Section 7
>>>>> government of uttar pradesh forwarded the letter of Yogi M. P. Singh
>>>>> to made available desired pointwise information within prescribed
>>>>> time. B.D.O. Chhanbey was also reminded that matter of Yogi M. P.
>>>>> Singh is pending since long time which is highly objectionable.
>>>>> Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 7.
>>>>> 9- It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey
>>>>> took under teeth the letters of P.M.O. , Chief Secretary's office ,
>>>>> Chief Minister's office as well as concerned ministry. Here this
>>>>> question arises that whether B.D.O. Chhanbey is above the law why is
>>>>> he not complying the directions of senior authorities? In view of your
>>>>> applicant B.D.O. Chhanbey ranks
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>