From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:38:49 +0530
Subject: Fwd: Action still awaited on appeal filed on 21march2011
before U.P.S.I.C. under subsection 3 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005
by Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur
(U.P.)
To: secypg@nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, cmup@up.nic.in,
pmosb@pmo.nic.in, acph-rb@rb.nic.in
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:26:35 +0530
Subject: Re: Action still awaited on appeal filed on 21march2011
before U.P.S.I.C. under subsection 3 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005
by Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur
(U.P.)
To: sec.sic@up.nic.in
Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant again wants to draw the
kind attention of Hon'ble Sir that B.D.O. Chanbey, Mirzapur only
misled your applicant and did not provide access to information as
sought. This is humble request of your applicant to consider
this reminder grievance in accordance with the law. For this your
applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours Sincerely.
Yogi M. P. Singh
On 10/23/11, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to
> draw the kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards following submissions
> as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble
> Sir that your applicant submitted aforesaid appeal to pass an
> appropriate order so that B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur (U.P.) made
> available desired information to your complainant as sought through
> the letter dated 21.11.2010 from C.D.O. Mirzapur in accordance with
> the provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005. Your applicant also requested to
> pass an appropriate order in accordance with the provisions of R.T.I.
> Act 2005 so that B.D.O. Chhanbey Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.) may not dare
> again to furnish misleading and incomplete information. This
> communique was sent on the same date by speed registered post to
> U.P.S.I.C. by your applicant with annexures. This appeal contained
> submissions under 8 points in five pages originally and annexure 1 in
> five pages, annexure 2 in three pages, annexure 3 , annexure 4 in four
> pages, annexure 5, annexure 6 in three pages and annexure 7 in three
> pages. 2-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that a
> supplementary petition to aforesaid appeal was submitted by your
> complainant on 21.6.2011 addressed to Hon'ble Chief Information
> Commissioner , Government of Uttar Pradesh, Indira Bhawan, sixth
> floor, Lucknow (U.P.) WITH PRAYER THAT Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to
> connect this supplementary with the appeal of Your complainant dated
> 21 march 2011 filed in S.I.C. under subsection 3 of section 19 of
> R.T.I. Act 2005. This is humble prayer of your complainant to direct
> B.D.O. Chhanbey to made available rest of information and not to take
> provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005 under teeth. B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur
> not only made the procrastinating efforts in dealing an R.T.I.
> Communique as well as misled repeatedly to your complainant. This
> supplementary was sent on the same date by your complainant through
> speed registered post.
> SUBMISSIONS OF SUPPLEMENTARY ARE AS FOLLOWS. 1-It is
> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your complainant submitted an
> appeal dated 21march2011 under subsection 3 of section 19 of R.T.I.
> Act 2005 to pass an appropriate order so that B.D.O. Chhanbey,
> Mirzapur made available desired information to your complainant as
> sought through the letter dated 21.11.2010 from C.D.O. Mirzapur.
> Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 1 in five
> pages. 2-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your
> complainant received a letter on 26.3.2011 sent by B.D.O. Chhanbey
> through registered post dated 10.3.2011 in which B.D.O. Chhanbey
> alleged that your complainant is not interested in seeking information
> instead more interested in finding and proving system faulty but did
> not furnish supportive evidence in regard to allegation. Hon'ble Sir
> may take a glance of annexure 2. 3-It is submitted
> before the Hon'ble Sir that your complainant submitted the reply of
> letter dated 10.3.2011 through the letter dated 27.3.2011 with the
> prayer that irksome delay by B.D.O. Chhanbey in providing information
> shows a lackadaisical approach towards official duty on the part of
> B.D.O. Chhanbey, before P.I.O. Mirzapur. PIO Mirzapur was also
> informed that B.D.O. Chhanbey through its letter dated 27.1.2011 made
> available list of selected beneficiaries (elligible villagers who may
> be benefitted through scheme based on survey reports). Even these
> computer copies are not certified to prove the authenticity of the
> list as required by law. Ipsofacto obvious from the perusal that no
> other documents are contained in the letter. Consequently baseless
> allegation was made by the B.D.O. Chhanbey against your complainant.
> It is unfortunate that list of allottees and grants provided them was
> not made available. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of
> annexure 3 in three pages. 4-It is submitted before the
> Hon'ble Sir that aforesaid letter dated 27.3.2011 was received in the
> office of PIO Mirzapur on 30.3.2011 and forwarded to B.D.O. Chhanbey
> with covering letter without bearing date and letter no. with
> direction to made available desired information to your complainant.
> Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 4. It is
> unfortunate that B.D.O. Chhanbey who think himself above law in
> schizophrenic way did not deem it fit to take any action on the letter
> of PIO Mirzapur which shows the sheer disregard towards the R.T.I. Act
> 2005 on the part of B.D.O. Chhanbey. This is humble
> request to you Hon'ble Sir to direct appropriate authority to made
> available list of allottees and grants provided to them. For this your
> applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours
> Sincerely. Yogi M. P. Singh. Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
> Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.)
>
No comments:
Post a Comment