Fwd: Manipulation in the record concerned with PLANTATION under MGNREGA in Vill-Nibi Gaharwar block-Chhanbey dist-Mirzapur(U.P.) BY B.D.O. concerned.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:52:21 +0530
Subject: Re: Manipulation in the record concerned with PLANTATION
under MGNREGA in Vill-Nibi Gaharwar block-Chhanbey dist-Mirzapur(U.P.)
BY B.D.O. concerned.
To: secypg@nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in,
acph-rb@rb.nic.in, ddpg2-arpg@nic.in, lokayukta@hotmail.com,
pmosb@pmo.nic.in, cmup@up.nic.in

Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant is reminding you Hon'ble
Sir that no action was taken by Hon'ble Sir on the matter as required
by law. I think that to maintain the sanctity of record in the public
office is a one of the important genuine duties of public authority is
to take seriously the charges of manipulation. When the sufficient
evidences of manipulation are available, then why concern public
authority is not taking action on the plea of your applicant. Here
this question arises that when no action is being taken by the public
authority against manipulator of public record on drawing the
attention by your applicant repeatedly then how it is possible that
public authority itself will take cognizance of manipulations of
public records? I think that all enquiry concern with the siphoning of
public fund is based on the public records so how public authority
will ascertain proper government fund utilization on the basis of
manipulated public records? This is humble request of your
applicant to direct public authority concern to take action my
pleading in accordance with the law. For this your applicant shall
ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours Sincerely. Yogi M. P.
Singh

On 3/17/12, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect, I am sending this reminder with the
> object that now this time, Hon'ble Sir will take action on my
> grievance in accordance with law in order to establish a rule of law
> in the state. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir.
> Yours sincerely. Yogi M. P. Singh
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:50:01 +0530
> Subject: Manipulation in the record concerned with PLANTATION under
> MGNREGA in Vill-Nibi Gaharwar block-Chhanbey dist-Mirzapur(U.P.) BY
> B.D.O. concerned.
> To: secypg@nic.in
>
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants draw
> kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards following submissions as
> follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble
> Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey sent communication dated 4.7.2011 addressed
> to C.D.O. Mirzapur letter no.271/sthan./RTI/2011-12 containing photo
> copy two work completion certificate as enclosures. Copies of
> aforesaid letter and concerned annexures were served to your applicant
> in order to comply the direction of PMO regarding your applicant's
> letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed to Hon'ble Prime Minister of India.
> 2-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
> in one of the work completion certificates, date of ending of work is
> 16.9.2006. In this certificate, 5 entries have been made. First entry
> on 13.9.2006. Second entry on 16.9.2006. Third entry on 15.10.2006
> (just after on month of completion of work). Fourt entry on
> 4.11.2007(after one year). Fifth entry on 4.11.2007(after one year).
> 3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that
> JE (RES) Chhanbey, Mirzapur made signature on 18.9.2006 on aforesaid
> impugned paper to certify it and his initial and date is on both the
> sides of paper. 4-It is submitted before the
> Hon'ble Sir that whether in india a work paper is certified earlier
> and entries are made latter as done by B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur.
> 5-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that aggrieved
> by the aforesaid letter, your applicant submitted an RTI Communique
> dated 28.7.2011 before C.D.O. Mirzapur under subsection 1 of section 6
> of R.T.I. Act 2005 to direct PIO of the department to made available
> information seeking pointwise within time stipulated under subsection
> 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act 2005. Sought information is as follows.
> Certified copy of aforesaid photo copies. Name, designation of
> employee who made entries dated 15.10.2006, 4.11.2007, 4.11.2007. Copy
> of payment sheet. Name who did payment. 6-It is
> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that aforesaid sought information is
> still awaited by your applicant. Why concerned staff violated the
> provision of R.T.I. Act 2005? 7-It is submitted before the
> Hon'ble Sir that D.D.O. Mirzapur/PIO sent communication dated
> 11.8.2011 letter no.1297 to your applicant also the same to B.D.O.
> Chhanbey, Mirzapur and directed B.D.O. Chhanbey to made available
> information as sought through the letter dated 28.7.2011 and also
> warned that in case of delay matter is broughtup before U.P.S.I.C.
> Then Hon'ble commission may impose penalty at the rate of 250 per day.
> As usual B.D.O. Chhanbey again overlooked the direction of his senior
> authority. This is humble request of your
> applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to pass
> appropriate order in accordance with the law. For this your applicant
> shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours Sincerely. Yogi M.
> P. Singh Moh- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)
>