Fwd: Even after four successive hearings in U.P.S.I.C. in the second appeal, B.S.A. Mirzapur did not provide sought information concerned with midday meal to Yogi M. P. Singh.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:43:06 +0530
Subject: Re: Even after four successive hearings in U.P.S.I.C. in the
second appeal, B.S.A. Mirzapur did not provide sought information
concerned with midday meal to Yogi M. P. Singh.
To: secypg@nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, s.mishra@nic.in,
cmup@up.nic.in, pmosb@pmo.nic.in

Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw your kind
attention towards following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that whether a letter
without letter no. of public office can be authentic.
2-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that whether B.S.A. can
make available non-certified photo-copy of letters as information
when information commissioner itself directed to made available
certified photo copies of letters during the earlier hearing, of even
those letter which you have already made available. 3--It is
submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that B.S.A. did not reply my RTI
communique and even did not reply when F.A.A. directed to do so. Now
proceeding is taking place in the U.P.S.I.C. since more than one year.
Whether this is not a fit case to impose pecuniar penalty if yes then
why information commission adopted lackadaisical approach in imposing
penalty on the B.S.A. Mirzapur. This is humble request to you Hon'ble
Sir to take action in accordance with the law. For this your applicant
shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely. Yogi M. P.
Singh, Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.)

On 4/18/12, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw kind
> attention of Hon'ble Sir on this reminder e-mail. Short submissions
> are as follows. 1-It is submitted before the
> Hon'ble Sir that more than one year passed since the date of first
> hearing in U.P.S.I.C. But unfortunately no complete information was
> made available by B.S.A. Mirzapur to your applicant. 2-It is
> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your applicant appeared before
> U.P.S.I.C. on 11 april 2012 and A.B.S.A. on behalf of B.S.A. Mirzapur.
> Assistant B.S.A. assured the commission that he will be instrumental
> in providing information to your applicant before next date of hearing
> ie on 1.8.2012. 3-It is submitted before the
> Hon'ble Sir that when B.S.A. Mirzapur violated the provision 7(1) of
> transparency act then why penal action was not taken against B.S.A.
> Mirzapur under section 20 (1) of R.T.I. Act 2005?
> 4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that if your applicant did
> not attend proceeding of U.P.S.I.C. Regularly , then whether it was
> possible to get any information from B.S.A. Mirzapur. 5-It
> is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that those commissioners who can
> not know whether respondent violated the provision of R.T.I. Act 2005
> or not or how to use subsection 8(b) of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005,
> then how, they can be instrumental in providing information.
> This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir to
> pass an appropriate direction in accordance with the law. For this
> your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours Sincerely.
> Yogi M. P. Singh
>
> On 3/1/12, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to
>> draw kind attention of the Hon'ble Sir towards following points as
>> follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that under
>> point 3 your applicant sought information as follows. " This is humble
>> request of your applicant to made available access to information
>> that any cook , cook instructor , attendants have been appointed if
>> appointed then made available who appointed them and what emoluments
>> are provided to them? Whether emoluments are provided to them through
>> cheque or account payee cheque or bearer cheque or cash.
>> 2--It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that B.S.A.
>> Mirzapur made available information that Gram Pradhan did not make
>> available information that what honorarium was paid? & whether it was
>> payed through cheque or cash. Therefore this information is not
>> available. 3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that B.S.A. did
>> not reply information sought under point 5. -It is submitted before
>> the Hon'ble Sir that when financial requirement under midday meal
>> scheme is fulfilled by Basic education department then how
>> transparency in scheme is possible if B.S.A. itself can not know what
>> payment was made to cooks. 6-It is submitted before the Hon'ble
>> Sir that information made available by B.S.A. Mirzapur is still
>> incomplete. 7-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir
>> that if I am taking the perusal of part information made available by
>> B.S.A. , then ipsofacto obvious that only 1.4kg per student rice was
>> provided by state government in one month in midday meal scheme. If 4
>> sundays may be deleted, then 25 days school remains open. This shows
>> that 56 gram rice is provided by state government to each student in
>> order to stop mal-nutrition in children. What a balance diet is
>> provided by state government in the name of midday meal scheme.
>> This is humble request of your applicant to you
>> Hon'ble Sir to direct appropriate authority to made available rest of
>> information. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir.
>> Yours Sincerely. Yogi M. P. Singh
>>
>> On 2/5/12, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:32:29 +0530
>>> Subject: Even after four successive hearings in U.P.S.I.C. in the
>>> second appeal, B.S.A. Mirzapur did not provide sought information
>>> concerned with midday meal to Yogi M. P. Singh.
>>> To: sec.sic@up.nic.in
>>>
>>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to
>>> draw kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards following points as
>>> follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble
>>> Sir that your applicant sought point-wise information from B.S.A.
>>> Mirzapur through its RTI communique dated 26.12.2010. under subsection
>>> 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005. 2-It is
>>> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that four successive hearing took
>>> place before the U.P.S.I.C. in the second appeal filed by your
>>> applicant but unfortunately B.S.A. Mirzapur only made available
>>> information sought under points 1 & 2 during the second time hearing
>>> and later his representative did not consider it fit to made
>>> available rest of informations except made excuses on filmsy ground.
>>> 3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that when the first
>>> time hearing was taking place in the second appeal then neither B.S.A.
>>> nor his subordinates considerd it appropriate to participate in the
>>> proceedings of commission. 4-It is submitted before the
>>> Hon'ble Sir that earlier in a different matter penalty was imposed by
>>> the U.P.S.I.C. on B.S.A. Mirzapur but district administration did not
>>> show any eagerness to recover the imposed penalty from the salary of
>>> B.S.A. Mirzapur. 5-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir
>>> that non recovery of penalty is the root cause of lackadaisical
>>> approach adopted by the PIOs in providing information.
>>> 6-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that next date of hearing of
>>> second appeal filed by your applicant is 11-April-2012.
>>> 7-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your
>>> applicant filed second appeal with prayer to direct B.S.A. Mirzapur to
>>> made available desired information sought through letter dated
>>> 26.12.2010 under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005. Which
>>> has not been made available yet. Your applicant also requested to
>>> award punishment to B.S.A. Mirzapur who is guilty of violating the
>>> subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act 2005 as well as non
>>> compliance of directive passed by the first appellate authority which
>>> is gross misconduct on the part of B.S.A. Mirzapur causing irreparable
>>> damage to the government system. This is humble
>>> request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir to pass an appropriate
>>> order as required by law. For this your applicant shall ever pray you
>>> Hon'ble Sir. Yours Sincerely. Yogi M. P. Singh
>>> ,Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.) India.
>>>
>>
>