Fwd: Why D.M. Mirzapur is not taking seriously the bungling of public fund and avoiding to take action against black sheep who siphoned public fund.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:42:21 +0530
Subject: Re: Why D.M. Mirzapur is not taking seriously the bungling of
public fund and avoiding to take action against black sheep who
siphoned public fund.
To: pmosb@pmo.nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, secypg@nic.in,
urgent-action@ohchr.org, csup@up.nic.in, cmup@up.nic.in,
ddpg2-arpg@nic.in

Next part of submissions 7-It is submitted before the
Hon'ble Sir that subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 states
that in case information sought from a public authority is held by
another public authority or subject matter is more closely connected
with the another public authority , then former transfers the
application or such part of it as may be appropriate to latter. 8-It
is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your complainant sought
information from D. M. Mirzapur not from executive engineer, jal
nigam, Mirzapur. Therefore demand of I.P.O. of Rs. 10.00 on the part
of excutive engineer , jal nigam , Mirzapur is illegal. The demand is
ultravires to the provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005.
9-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that matter is concerned
with the scam in the installation of public hand pumps and rebore in
Block-Chhnbey as published in the leading news paper Amar Ujala in
Mirzapur news dated 8 may 2010 and D. M. Mirzapur is the supreme
monitoring body under whose supervision developmental activities are
carriedout at district level so D.M. is most accountable person and
she can't overlook her statutory liability. 10-It is submitted before
the Hon'ble Sir that in order to bringh transparency, D. M. Mirzapur
should have directed to PIO to made available information as desired
by complainant instead aforesaid letter to department against which
allegations have been made. Ipsofacto obvious that irk-some delay is
being made to frustrate your complainant as well as to screen the
offenders. This unhealthy practice has been common to our society
which is great obstacle in the smooth running of democratic process in
the country. All constructive efforts of government is going in vein.
This humble request of your complainant to
Hon'ble Sir that in view of complainant, concerned matter may tarnish
the image of bureaucratic setup which is not in favour of healthy
democracy. Therefore the need of hour is to direct proper authorities
to function in accordance with the law and appropriate order may be
issued against law breakers. For this your complainant shall ever pray
you Hon'ble Sir. Dated 5.8.2010 It is submitted before the
Hon'ble Sir that if allegation is made against any reputed institution
,then it comes forward to refute those allegations publicaly and
transparently but the act of D. M. Mirzapur is throughout negative and
seemed shielding the erring staff during the entire episode of
bungling of public fund. The core issue is sought information is still
awaited. This is humble request to you Hon'ble Sir to
take some steps as required by law in order to get the blessings of
poor and downtrodden. Yours sincerely. Yogi M. P. Singh
Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.)

On 7/14/12, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hon'ble Sir. Please take the perusal of second appeal submitted before
> U.P.S.I.C. under subsection 3 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005 dated
> 5.8.2010 sent on the same date by registered post on the same date.
> Subject-To direct D. M. Mirzapur to made available desired
> information as sought through the letter dated 10.5.2010 addressed to
> D. M. Mirzapur. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to pass appropriate order
> against the violators for infringing the provisions of R.T.I. Act
> 2005. Hon'ble Sir. With due respect I
> want to draw the kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards following
> submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before
> the Hon'ble Sir that your complainant made an application dated
> 10.5.2010 before D. M. Mirzapur under subsection 1 of section 6 of
> R.T.I. Act 2005 sent on the same address and on the same by the speed
> registered post. Hon'ble Sir may take the perusal of annexure 1 in
> five pages. 2-It is submitted before the
> Hon'ble Sir that in the aforesaid letter your complainant requested D.
> M. Mirzapur to direct PIO to furnish access to information point-wise
> to complainant within time stipulated under subsection 1 of section 7
> of R.T.I. Act 2005. 3-It is submitted before
> the Hon'ble Sir that instead of furnishing information, PIO
> collectorate , Mirzapur transferred the aforesaid letter to
> Superintending Engineering , jal nigam, Mirzapur through its letter
> dated 1.6.2010. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of
> annexure 2. 4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that Excutive
> Engineer , jal nigam, Mirzapur informed your complainant through
> letter no. 3640 dated 25.6.2010 that your letter dated 10.5.2010
> consists of postal order of Rs.10.00 is not payable to Excutive
> Engineer , jal nigam, Mirzapur so said postal order is not admissible.
> Therefore desired postal order may be sent so that desired information
> may be made available. The demand was illegal and deviating so
> direction was not complied by your complainant. Hon'ble Sir may be
> pleased to take the perusal of annexure 3. 5-It is
> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that prescribed period of 30 days to
> made available information as specified under subsection 1 of section
> 7 of R.T.I. Act 2005 expired but PIO collectorate could not furnish
> the desired information. 6-It is submitted before the
> Hon'ble Sir that your complainant filed an appeal dated 29.6.2010
> before commissioner , Vindhyachal Division , Mirzapur to direct
> appropriate authority to made available excess to information
> point-wise as sought through the letter dated 10.5.2010 in accordance
> with the provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005. It is unfortunate that
> aforesaid appeal filed under subsection 1 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act
> 2005 was not considered by commissioner , Vindhyachal Division which
> shows the sheer disregard towards the provisions of RTI Act by the
> commissioner, vindhyachal division. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take
> the perusal of annexure 4 in four pages. Continued
> .........
>
> On 7/5/12, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw kind
>> attention of Hon'ble Sir towards RTI communique dated 10.5.2010
>> addressed to D.M. Mirzapur as follows. An
>> application under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005.
>> To Hon'ble
>> District Magistrate Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.) Subject-To direct
>> your PIO to furnish access to information point-wise to your applicant
>> within time stipulated under subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act
>> 2005. (Short Submissions) It is
>> submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that a piece of news titled scam in
>> installation of public hand pumps and rebore in the Block-Chhanbey was
>> published in the distinguished daily Amar Ujala in Mirzapur news dated
>> 8 may 2010. Hon'ble Sir may take the perusal of the photo-copy of the
>> said news as annexure to application. Hon'ble Sir.
>> With due respect I want to request you Hon'ble Sir to made available
>> point-wise information as follows. 1-It is
>> request to you Hon'ble Sir to made available information that How many
>> public hand pumps out of 70 have been installed at private premises
>> and how much money has been realized as illegal gratification in
>> exchange? 2-It is request to you Hon'ble Sir to
>> made available information that How many public hand pumps have been
>> shown rebored out of 348 without reboring? 3-It is
>> request to you Hon'ble Sir to made available information that How many
>> hand pumps have been shown rebored which are not even in existence?
>> 4-It is request to you Hon'ble Sir to made available
>> information that who monitored the entire process of installation and
>> reboring of public hand pumps at the block level? Please made
>> available the name and designation of this authority. 5-It is
>> request to you Hon'ble Sir to made available information that whether
>> verification is being carriedout by block level employees or any
>> committee constituted at district level for such a large scale scam.
>> I humbly request you Hon'ble Sir to direct your PIO to
>> made available point-wise information at the earliest. For this your
>> applicant shall ever pray you. Yours sincerely
>> Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.)
>> Date.10.5.2010 Note-A postal order of Rs.10.00 is
>> annexed. This is my humble respect to you Hon'ble Sir that D.M.
>> Mirzapur be directed to be instrumental in enquiry of entire episode
>> and bunglers must be booked behind the bars and information must be
>> made available to your applicant as sought. For this your applicant
>> shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours sincerely
>> Yogi M. P. Singh Moh- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road,
>> Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.)
>>
>