ATTACK ON HINDUISM & GROWING RADICALIZATION OF MUSLIMS
Hindus are a punching back. Anybody can smash Hindus, Hinduism, etc. Why? Hindus are by nature peaceful. This goodness is taken advantage of by the minorities to bully Hindus, Hinduism, Modi, BJP RSS VHP and our Hindu traditions and Values etc.
If Hindus fail to defend India the 2nd partition is not far off and the media is helping towards this end especially NDTV, IBN TV18.
From: Dr.M.C. Gupta - mcgupta44@gmail.com;
Saturday, February 14, 2015
I am 73. I retired as a professor of medicine in 2001 and then joined the bar and have been practicing law since then. I live in Delhi. I had seen Mahatma Gandhi once during his prayer meetings.
I have been a great Gandhi follower. Gandhi was a follower of Gita. A true follower of Gita would have remembered that Krishna did not teach non-violence to Arjun. It is OK to be violent when duty demands it. Gandhi would have known that Krishna even asked Arjun to slay Karn when the latter's chariot got stuck in mud / some obstacle. Killing a soldier when he was incapacitated was adharma. yet Krishna asked Arjun to attack Karn. So much for Gandhi's following the Gita.
Vinoba was a follower of Gandhi. He was a great scholar of Sanskrit and wrote treatises on Gita. It would be of interest to know his views about Gandhi. I have not come across the same.
I am tempted to give below a long quote about the Moplah massacre of Hindus and Gandhi's turning a blind eye to it--
"GANDHI, THE MOULANA OF MUSLIM APPEASEMENT
http://www.ivarta.com/columns/OL_070120.htm
By: V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
January 20, 2007
It is a well known fact of history that although personally Mahatma Gandhi was a devout Hindu, yet he turned more and more anti-Hindu after 1920 as his public life progressed. The driving passion of his political life was to throw the British out of India. In order to achieve this objective, he was obsessed in his conviction that Hindu - Muslim unity was absolutely necessary and indispensable. There can be two views or more on whether he was right or justified in holding these convictions. However, the irrefutable fact is that again and again he demonstrated his combat readiness to sacrifice or sell out vital Hindu interests, Hindu honor and Hindu blood all the time in deference to the feelings of minorities in general and Muslims in particular. To quote the appropriate words of Prafull Goradia in this context: "For Mahatma Gandhi, no price was too great for appeasing Muslims, so that they did not oppose Hindus. That he did not understand the Muslims was proved by the conduct of the Muslim League and by the vivisection of the country."
After the Mutiny of 1857, the incidence of Hindu-Muslim riots in India had come down sharply. By lending support to the Khilafat Movement of Ali Brothers in 1920, Mahatma Gandhi inaugurated a new era of a fresh wave of Hindu-Muslim riots. Mahatma Gandhi was a confused man. How could his Satyagraha which was to be effective for attaining our Swaraj could be equally effective for saving the Caliph on his Turkish throne. Gandhi did not understand that restoration of the Caliph would only result in making him again a shining symbol of Pan-Islamism or the Supranationalism of Islam as a world religion with its people forming the Ummah. This inherent impending danger was clearly foreseen by Sir Sankaran Nair, a Member of the Viceroy's Executive Council in 1922. In his book prophetically titled as "Gandhi and Anarchy" published by Tagore and Company, Madras in 1922 he wrote: "It is impossible to believe that Gandhi and his adherents are not aware that this claim of the Mahomedans to be judged only by the Law of the Koran, is a claim which is the fons et origo of all Khilafat claims of whatever kind. It is well to be clear about this, for not only does the acceptance of the claim mean the death knell of the British Empire or Indo-British Commonwealth, WHATEVER NAME WE MAY CARE TO GIVE TO THE GREAT FRATERNITY OF NATIONS TO WHICH WE BELONG, BUT SPECIFICALLY AS REGARDS INDIA IT MEANS A REAL DENIAL OF SWARAJ. FOR IT INVOLVES MAHOMEDAN RULE AND HINDU SUBJECTION." Thus Sir Sankaran Nair clearly saw the danger signal when Mahatma Gandhi was leading the Muslims of India to convert the Hindus into permanent Serfs. Dr Manmohan Singh's recent declaration on Muslim hegemony is only a logical culmination of the process initiated by Mahatma Gandhi and clearly foreseen by Sir Sankaran Nair in 1922.
During the Moplah rebellion in Kerala in 1921, thousands of Hindu men, women and children were killed by the Muslims. Hundreds of women were raped. And yet Gandhi supported the Moplahs and not the Hindu victims of Moplah violence and oppression. In fact Gandhi had no sympathy for the Hindus. Mahatma Gandhi wrote in his "Young India", "it is wrong to say that Islam has employed force. No religion in this world has spread through the use of force. No Musalman, to my knowledge, has ever approved of compulsion." Does this not show that Gandhi practiced political deception? According to Gandhi, the Moplah Muslims were guilty of no crime.
But the politically spurious and culturally disastrous view of Mahatma Gandhi on the Moplah rebellion was not shared by Lord Reading, the then Viceroy of India and Sir Sankaran Nair, a member of his Council. Sir Sankaran Nair wrote: "For sheer brutality on women, I do not remember anything in history to match the Malabar rebellion. It broke out on 20 August, 1921. Even by the 6 September, the results were dreadful. There was complete breakdown of Civil Government resulting in widespread disorder, in political chaos, in anarchy and in ruin." Let us contrast this with Mahatma Gandhi's conclusion: "The Moplahs are among the bravest in the land. They are god-fearing." How did Gandhi overlook the brutal fact that Moplah Muslims were men-slaughtering, children-strangling and women-raping? I am asking this question in the light of the speech of Lord Reading, viceroy of India, on 20th of August 1921: "A few Europeans and many Hindus have been murdered, communications have been obstructed. Hindu temples sacked, houses of Europeans and Hindus burnt. According to reports Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam... The result has been the temporary collapse of the Civil Government and offices and courts have ceased to function and ordinary business has been brought to a standstill. European and Hindu refugees of all classes are concentrated at Calicut and it is satisfactory to note that they are safe there. One trembles to think of the consequences if the forces of order had not prevailed for the protection of Calicut. Those who are responsible for causing this grave outbreak of violence and crime must be brought to justice and made to suffer the punishment of the guilty."
Gandhi was a lawyer. He was capable of drawing objective conclusions. No sane mind could have refused to see the brutality of Moplahs. Gandhi had said at that time--A true Hindu should not mind dying at the hands of a Muslim brother. This is not what a lawyer or layman should say.
As regards Godse, the government may not think it prudent to take drastic steps. But the minimum it should do is as follows:
1--It should remove the ban on "Nine hours to Ram" and the film made on this book.
2--It should allow people to write in praise of Godse and to make memorials to him. After all, these are part of free speech.
I end my note by exhorting all to read Godse's speech in the court in his defence. It is attached herewith.
--M C Gupta, 15-2-2015
------------------------
WHY ARE WE AFRAID OF NATHU RAM GODSE?
From: Narayanaswamy Subramanian - s_narayanaswamy@yahoo.com;
Sunday, February 08, 2015
An excellent collation of genuine sentiments, information, detailed data about National Supreme Patriot Nathuram Vinayak Godse and his opposite -- National Traitor Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, who was expelled from his Baniya caste and became a true pariah.
In New Delhi the existing monuments to Gandhi and to his apostate-atheist disciple Jawarhar Lal Nehru should be destroyed. They should be replaced by towering monuments to Nathuram Godse and Naranjan Apte, plus to Maharana Pratap, Chhatrapathi Shivaji, Vinayak D Sarvakar, Bhagat Singh and Subhas Chandra Bose.
This should happen in every State capital in India, and where Indians have settled abroad in substantial numbers, for example London (United Kingdom), Perth (Australia), San Francisco, New York, Austin (Texas) (United States of America), Pretoria, Cape Town, Bloemfontein, Johannesburg (South Africa), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), Singapore.
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
--------------------
From: Ganji, Shobhan - shobhan.ganji@mail.rakuten.com;
Monday, February 09, 2015
shobhan.ganji@mail.rakuten.com;
Gandhi is a rascal. Nobody with right mind will praise Gandhi. One who has some basic common sense will throw this fraudster saint out of the home. One must carefully read this paragraph to understand the Pyscho Gandhi. It is time we call a spade a spade. There is no need to protect this Pyscho Gandhi.
Those were terrible days. Hindu and Sikh refugees from Pakistan were struggling to keep body and soul together. Many of them had lost their loved ones in the partition riots -- women were raped in front of their husbands and children; young girls were abducted; men were disembowelled; trains arrived laden with dead bodies; people fleeing marauders were set upon with ferocious brutality. Madanlal Pahwa, a young refugee, Malgonkar writes, "reached a place called Fazilka, in Indian territory, and discovered that another refugee column in which his father and other relatives had set out, had fared much worse. They had been attacked by Muslim mobs: 'Only 40 or 50 had survived out of 400 or 500...'." Delhi was flooded by nearly one million refugees, all of them desperately looking for food and shelter. They were distraught and traumatised, unable to figure out why their lives had been turned upside down in so gruesome a manner. Nor could they understand the rationale behind protecting Delhi's Muslims. What left them aghast was Gandhi's insistence that Hindu and Sikh refugees should be sent back to Pakistan and Muslims who had left India be brought back. It didn't make sense. Nor did the vicious blood-letting that followed. Meanwhile, Pakistan had launched its mission to smash and grab Jammu & Kashmir and was demanding that India hand over Rs 55 crore, its share of the cash reserve inherited from the departing British colonial Government.
-------------------
INDIA MUST ABANDONED GANDH-ISM
Posted by: "J. G. Arora" <jgarora@gmail.com>
Sunday, February 01, 2015
1. The killing of colonels and policemen like Colonel Munindra Nath Rai and Policeman Sanjeevan Singh by pro-Pakistan elements in Jammu & Kashmir from time to time are disgraceful tragedies for the nation Such tragedies are very frequent, and are happening due to Gandhian policies followed by successive Indian governments including the present BJP-led government.
2. Since Gandhi-ism means appeasement, self-negation, unconditional surrender and pathway to slavery, such tragedies will continue to happen so long as Mahatma Gandhi remains the role model of the nation. For its very survival as a nation, India must be liberated from Gandhi-ism. Moreover, India must have warriors like Maharana Pratap and Chhatrapati Shivaji as its role-models instead of Mahatma Gandhi who brought India's worst defeat in history while conceding Muslim League's demand for the creation of Pakistan for Muslims whereby Bharat lost vital parts of its territory.
Gandhi was publicly doing untouchability, temple entry, khadi and clean toilets and as gullible Hindus came to the streets trotting faithfully behind Gandhi thinking he was leading them to freedom thru clean toilets, khadi and temple entry, Gandhi was undermining Tilak, decimating Ambedkar, evicting Subhash Bose, silencing KM Munshi, Patel and Rajaji, inking deals with Lord Irwin, negotiating with the Cabinet Mission and hobnobbing with Mountbatten behind the scenes, away from public scrutiny.
------------------------------------------
DELHI POLICE REPORT ON CHURCH ATTACK
QUESTIONING WHY THE MEDIA DID NOT PRINT OR BROADCAST THAT IN DELHI 265 TEMPLES WERE VANDALIZED in 2014--- WHY THIS WAS NOT HIGHLIGHTED?
IS IT ANTI HINDU PROPAGANDA, ANTI BJP, AND PROPAGATING AAP ELECTIONEERING-
MINORITY APPEASEMENT BY TV?
When Delhi Police was asked why churches were repeatedly attack in the capitol they replied saying there is no pattern observed in repeated Church attacks, the incident can be described as a stray case of theft. The Police also state that 265 temples were also seen thefts in Delhi in the last one year but the same has not been highlighted in the press or broadcast in the media,. The question is why? In a Report to the Home Ministry.
ALSO WHY OBAMA PONTIFICATE BY INCITING HATRED AND BRING DIVISION IN INDIAN MULTI- RELIGIOUS SOCIETY AT A TIME OF ELECTION. RAISED OR BEG THE QUESTION IS THE CIA FUND AAP PARTY?
Obama by his stupid comments, exposed his ignorance both on Gandhi and religious intolerance.
It was Gandhi, Nehru and Jinnah who divided the country on religious line.
A separate country for Muslims. Gandhiji supported the Khilafat movement and it is this movement that resulted in the massacre of 4000 innocent a Hindu Malayalees in Kerala.. Annie Besant wrote a stinker to Gandhiji for his support to Khilafat movement. Gandhi maintained a stand that Hindus should not retaliate against Muslims. So much fo Gandhiji Religious Tolerance to which Obama's make reference to.
Obama never talked about the genocide of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Because he funds the terrorist to attack Hindus and India.
Obama never tells the world, why American Christians are slaughtering millions of Muslims for the sake of cheap oil (read petrol).Obama never tells the world, why women cannot vote in Saudi Arabia and Vatican.
YES! Our so called secular media is happy if some
good-for-nothing fellows run down Hindus, India, Hinduism BJP, RSS, VHP etc. Such is their patriotic fervor of our free and fair unaccountable unanswerable presses.
Our secular freedom of speech media never bothered about the 59 women and children roasted alive in Godhra. Till date, the media has neither published their photos or names. But the same media is ecstatic over the remarks of Obama.
Our media must know that American Christians are thrashing Obama for his comments on inquisition, slavery etc and Indian media is ecstatic about Obama's reference to religious intolerence in India. WHAT A TRAGEDY!
The Media is afraid of criticizing Muslims - why -because Muslims will physically attack them. Media is afraid of criticizing Christians because of the money power and the world-wide reach will destroy their reputations.
Bizarre bans in Saudi Arabia (and another on brutality of Saudi regime)
From: hitaya123 hitaya123@gmail.com
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
In his otherwise wonderful trip and camaradarie Obama had in India, his lecture to India on religious freedom is uncalled for. (I understand he was pressured by missionary groups in the West which want to convert India). What is bizarre is he goes to Saudi Arabia from India and was forced to have Michelle Obama all covered up and he would not speak on the intolerance and brutality of Saudi regime.
See below with pictures the bizarre restrictions in Saudi Arabia (rediff article). Also given another article below on the brutality of the Saudi regime and the wisdom of UK and India declaring day of mourning for the Saudi King's death. (We should perhaps declare a day of mourning for Saudi women under the Saudi regime).
Narendra Modi should consider presenting Obama the sayings of Mahatma Gandhi on missionary conversions and Ghar Vapasi program. Gandhi ji hated to the core the missionary activities in India and he was hardly kind in his words against them, in spite of some of the closest friends of his were missionaries. He called them 'deadliest poison' and would have banned conversions in India long time ago.
Thus spoke Mahatma Gandhi, "If I had the power and could legislate, I should stop all proselytizing. In Hindu households the advent of a missionary has meant the disruption of the family coming in the wake of change of dress, manners, language, food and drink" (November 5, 1935)
----------------------
From: Subramanian Swamy <swamy39@gmail.com>
Date: 27 January 2015
Subject: CHURCHILL AND HITLER: TWO SIDES OF A COIN
To: Amit Bhadhuri <abhadhuri924@gmail.com>
Seventy years ago to day the Russian troops entered into the Auschwitz camp in Poland and freed the remaining half-dead or nearly dead Jews after over a million of Jews of all ages were killed there through mostly gas chambers or by the firing squads of Hitler, Hitler's Nazis and SS soldiers.
. It is widely accepted , that, six million (though the figure is debatable) Jews were eliminated
for no faults on their parts in between 1938 and 1945 from the direct guidance
and leadership of Hitler.
An exactly similar genocide happened in India in between 1942-45 by Churchill and the British in Bengal which no one ever talks about it because of slavish Indian mindset. Bengalis have always been a rice-consuming race though their food habits have changed a lot in post-partition period.
In 1942 Churchill ordered that all rice produced in Bengal must be all shipped out to the British war machinery anywhere in the world
and all ships and boats were confiscated for the job. Within months famine broke out in united Bengal.
Many requests from the Governor of united Bengal and the
Governor-General of India to Churchill to relax part of the restrictions on rice supply and ships requisitions went all in total vain. By 1945 nearly three million Bengalis died on starvation. Churchill's reaction was that Indians breed like rabbits so it was good to control the population of India through starvation.
And do you know what British planted SCROOGE Gandhi did at that time? His Quit-India movement was like a dead donkey in two years time by the time it was 1944. During the entire period of WW2 and
during the Bengal famine time Gandhi was visiting thousands of Indian villages, towns and cities to recruit the cheapest voluntary soldiers could be available for the rogue and thug Brits who were still hanging Indian freedom fighters at the same time with the help of Gandhi they managed to recruit two and a half million Indians for Brit war machinery in WW2.
Indians have never read the real history and watching Namo over the last nine months I have no hesitation to say, though he has many great qualities in him and the possibly the best PM India ever got but like average Indians he also has a great degree of inbred deceitful trend in his nature or else Gandhi could not have been his idol and role model and his fierce commitment to promote Gandhi.
Jai Hind,
CHURCHILL AND HITLER: TWO SIDES OF A COIN
From: Shriharsha Sharma - drshsharma@gmail.com;
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Churchill was no less than Hitler but never been questioned or tried neither by media or so called free world it shows double standard , is the root cause of all the problems at local, regional, national and international level.
Shriharsha
---------------------
http://www.pravakta.com/gandhijis-assassination-and-conspiracy-to?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pravakta+%28PRAVAKTA+%E0%A5%A4+%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8D%E2%80%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%29
ललितपुर(उत्तरप्रदेश) में जन्मे सिद्धार्थजी ने स्कूली शिक्षा जामनगर (गुजरात) से प्राप्त की, ज़िन्दगी क्या है इसे पुणे (महाराष्ट्र) में जाना और जीना इंदौर/उज्जैन (मध्यप्रदेश) में सीखा। पढ़ाई-लिखाई से उन्हें छुटकारा मिला तो घुमक्कड़ी जीवन व्यतीत कर भारत को करीब से देखा। वर्तमान में उनका केन्द्र भोपाल (मध्यप्रदेश) है। पेशे से पत्रकार हैं, सो अपने आसपास जो भी घटित महसूसते हैं उसे कागज़ की कतरनों पर लेखन के माध्यम से उड़ेल देते हैं। राजनीति पसंदीदा विषय है किन्तु जब समाज के प्रति अपनी जिम्मेदारियों का भान होता है तो सामाजिक विषयों पर भी जमकर लिखते हैं। वर्तमान में दैनिक जागरण, दैनिक भास्कर, हरिभूमि, पत्रिका, नवभारत, राज एक्सप्रेस, प्रदेश टुडे, राष्ट्रीय सहारा, जनसंदेश टाइम्स, डेली न्यूज़ एक्टिविस्ट, सन्मार्ग, दैनिक दबंग दुनिया, स्वदेश, आचरण (सभी समाचार पत्र), हमसमवेत, एक्सप्रेस न्यूज़ (हिंदी भाषी न्यूज़ एजेंसी) सहित कई वेबसाइटों के लिए लेखन कार्य कर रहे हैं और आज भी उन्हें अपनी लेखनी में धार का इंतज़ार है।
http://www.pravakta.com/author/siddharthashankargautamgmail-com
गांधीजी की हत्या और संघ के प्रति षडयंत्र
सिद्धार्थ शंकर गौतम January 30, 2015 जन-जागरण No Comments
एक ओर जहां दुनिया राष्ट्रपिता महात्मा गांधी की ६७वीं पुण्यतिथि पर उन्हें नमन करते हुए उनके आदर्शों और शिक्षाओं को आत्मसात कर श्रद्धांजलि अर्पित कर रही है, वहीं इतने वर्षों बाद भी राष्ट्र को देवी रूप में पूजने वाले विश्व के सबसे बड़े सामाजिक संगठन संघ को उनकी हत्या के षड़यंत्र से जोड़ने की कृसित मानसिकता राजनीतिक लाभ-हानि की दृष्टि की परिचायक है। हाल ही में ऐसी खबरें आई थीं कि हिंदू महासभा के कुछ नेता गांधीजी के हत्यारे नाथूराम गोडसे का मंदिर बनवाना चाहते हैं। यहां तक कि कुछ उन्मादी महासभा के नेताओं ने तो बाकायदा गोडसे पर एक फिल्म भी बना डाली थी जो गांधीजी की हत्या से जुड़े विवादों पर अपना पक्ष रखने का जरिया थी। हालांकि महासभा की इन दोनों कोशिशों को न तो राजनीतिक संरक्षण मिला और न ही जनसमर्थन। किन्तु इस बहाने संघ के प्रति विवाद और विरोध का जो रूप सामने आया उसने विचारधाराओं के ऐसे द्वंद्व को धरातल पर उकेरा है जिसमें आक्षेप की राजनीति का पुट अधिक जान पड़ता है। आज भी संघ का नाम गांधीजी की हत्या से जोड़ना भारतीय न्याय व्यवस्था और लोकतांत्रिक मान्यताओं का मखौल बनाना है, जिनपर जनता की आस्थाएं टिकी होती हैं। एक सच्चा संघ स्वयंसेवक गांधीजी के दिखाए रास्ते पर चलता है, उनकी पहचान बन चुकी लाठी को धारण करता है, अहिंसा के सिद्धांत को आदर्श मानता है, जात-पांत को नकारता है, राष्ट्र के प्रति अपनी जिम्मेदारियों का निष्ठापूर्वक वहन करता है। यदि संघ को बदनाम करने वाले कुछेक समूहों को संघ स्वयंसेवक की लाठी हथियार प्रतीत होती है तो यकीन मानिए उनका गांधी में भी विश्वास नहीं है। इतिहास को अपनी मर्ज़ी से थोपने वाले आरोप लगाने की जल्दबाजी में शायद यह भूल जाते हैं कि संघ में गांधीजी को पूजनीय माना जाता है। गांधीजी और संघ का रिश्ता ऐसी महीन लकीर पर चलता था जिसे जान-बूझकर असहमति का रूप दिया गया। प्रखर राष्ट्रवादी डॉ. केशव बलिराम हेडगेवार, जिन्होंने १९२५ को विजयादशमी के पावन पर्व पर अपने विश्वस्त साथियों के साथ विचार-विमर्श कर नागपुर में संघ कार्यपद्धति का श्रीगणेश किया, स्वयं गांधीजी के पुराने सहयोगी थे। दरअसल, डॉ. हेडगेवार ने अखंड हिन्दुस्थान के जिस सपने के साथ संघ स्थापना की थी, उसका लक्ष्य बहुत बड़ा एवं विस्तारित परिपेक्ष्य में था, जिसे मात्र स्वाधीनता के लक्ष्य से पूरा नहीं किया जा सकता था। संघ के दर्शन में शुरू से ही एकता की प्रक्रिया के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्थान को एक शक्तिशाली राष्ट्र के रूप में देखना और समस्त समुदायों का राष्ट्र की जीवनधारा में सम्मिलित होना सर्वोपरि है। कमोबेश यही विचार गांधीजी के भी थे। वे भी हिन्दुस्थान के विश्व गुरु बनने के सपने को जीते थे। 1934 में महात्मा गांधी ने वर्धा (महाराष्ट्र) में संघ के शिविर का दौरा किया था। संघ संस्थापक डॉ. केशव बलिराम हेडगेवार से उनकी भेंट भी हुई। ऐसा प्रचारित किया गया है कि गांधीजी संघ विचारधारा के प्रति आशंकित थे किंतु वर्धा में संघ शिविर के दौरे के पश्चात उन्होंने इसे प्रखर राष्ट्रवादी एवं सामाजिक संगठन कहा था। डॉ. हेडगेवार खुद गांधीजी के बहुत बड़े प्रशंसक थे। यहां तक कि गांधीजी के असहयोग आंदोलन में उन्होंने बढ़-चढ़कर हिस्सा लिया था। डॉ. हेडगेवार गांधीजी के उस दर्शन से बहुत प्रभावित थे कि आजादी मिलेगी तो अहिंसा से, हिंसा से नहीं। डॉ. हेडगेवार का भी मानना था कि अहिंसा का मार्ग स्वतंत्रता प्राप्ति का सर्वोत्तम मार्ग है। डॉ. हेडगेवार और गांधीजी में एक समानता यह भी थी कि दोनों ही खादी का प्रयोग करते थे और अपने अनुयायियों को भी इसके इस्तेमाल हेतु प्रेरित करते थे। गांधीजी, डॉ. हेडगेवार की कांग्रेसी पृष्ठभूमि, उनकी शिक्षा, आजीवन अविवाहित रहकर राष्ट्र के लिए समर्पण के उनके भाव का आदर करते थे, वहीं डॉ. हेडगेवार गांधीजी के चिंतन एवं नैतिक बल के प्रशंसक थे। संघ में यह स्पष्ट था कि डॉ. हेडगेवार का कहना संघ स्वयंसेवकों के लिए आदेश होता था जिसे पूर्ण करना वे अपना कर्तव्य समझते थे। गांधीजी द्वारा आव्हान किए गए आंदोलनों में डॉ. हेडगेवार के आदेश का संघ स्वयंसेवकों ने अक्षरक्ष: पालन किया और गांधीजी के दिखाए मार्ग पर चले। इतना तो स्पष्ट था कि संघ स्वयंसेवकों में गांधीजी के प्रति आदर-भाव था और डॉ. हेडगेवार के आदेश के बिना वे कोई कार्य नहीं करते थे। तब ऐसी क्या परिस्थितियां निर्मित हुईं कि गांधीजी की हत्या की गई और उसमें संघ को षड़यंत्र कर फंसाने की चेष्टा हुई?
दरअसल, 1906 में मुस्लिम लीग की स्थापना के बाद स्वाधीनता आंदोलन में हिंदू-मुसलमान दो ध्रुव बन गए थे। एक ओर मुस्लिम लीग मुसलमानों की नुमाइंदगी कर रही थी तो हिंदू महासभा ने हिंदुत्व के एजेंडे को आगे बढ़ाना शुरू कर दिया था। हालांकि 1940 तक आते-आते संघ की गिनती कांग्रेस के बाद दूसरे सबसे बड़े संगठन के रूप में होने लगी थी। जाहिर है, कांग्रेस के एक गुट (जो भारत की स्वाधीनता पर अपना जन्मसिद्ध अधिकार समझता था) को संघ की बढ़ती ताकत नागवार गुजरी और उसने संघ के राष्ट्रवाद को हिंदू-मुसलमान के बीच वैमनस्य फैलाने का नाम दे दिया। जिस प्रकार मुस्लिम लीग पृथक मुस्लिम राष्ट्र की मांग कर रही थी, उसी प्रकार षड़यंत्र कर संघ का नाम भी पृथक हिंदू राष्ट्र की मांग से जोड़ दिया गया। यहां तक कि संघ को हिंदू महासभा का पिछलगु होने का तमगा भी दे डाला। जबकि सच्चाई यह है कि डॉ. हेडगेवार ने स्वयं कई बार हिंदू महासभा को संघ के कार्यों से पृथक बताया था। उन्होंने महासभा के राजनीतिक प्रस्तावों से ज्यादा महत्व कांग्रेस के प्रस्तावों को दिया। कुछ हद तक वैचारिक सहमति होने के बावजूद उन्होंने संघ को कभी हिंदू महासभा की छाया नहीं बनने दिया। ऐसे कई मौके आए जबकि डॉ. हेडगेवार हिंदू महासभा की राय से जुदा दिखे। डॉ. हेडगेवार मुस्लिम लीग की कट्टरता और हिंदू महासभा की उग्रता दोनों को गलत मानते थे। उनका मानना था कि राष्ट्रीयता के प्रश्न पर दो मतों को मानने वालों की राय अलग-अलग नहीं हो सकती। उन्होंने यह प्रश्न भी उठाया कि क्या भारत में सिर्फ हिंदू-मुसलमान रहते हैं, अन्य धर्मों के धर्मालंबियों की स्वतंत्रता और अधिकारों का क्या? इसी बीच 16 अगस्त 1946 को मुस्लिम लीग का 'डायरेक्ट एक्शन' आंदोलन शुरू हुआ। कलकत्ता में 5000 हिंदुओं की हत्या हुई तथा 15000 से अधिक जख्मी हुए। पूरे देश में 300 से भी अधिक सहायता शिविर हिंदू शरणार्थियों के लिए चलाए गए। संघ के हिंदुओं के प्रति समर्पण को देखकर 16 सितंबर 1947 को गांधीजी ने दिल्ली में 500 स्वयंसेवकों को संबोधित भी किया। आज़ादी के बाद तो हिन्दुओं पर एकाएक अत्याचारों का सिलसिला बढ़ गया था। उस दौर की तात्कालिक परिस्थितियों के अनुसार गांधीजी अल्पसंख्यक हितों के लिए जो प्रयत्न कर रहे थे वे यदि उन्मादी युवकों को रास नहीं आए तो इसमें संघ की कैसी गलती?
चूंकि एक बड़े वर्ग ने षड़यंत्रपूर्वक संघ के नाम को गांधीजी की हत्या से जोड़कर जनता को भ्रमित किया लिहाजा वही परिपाटी आज तक जारी है। संघ विरोधियों ने गांधीजी की हत्या के विषय में अनेकानेक झूठी बातें फैलाईं। मसलन, हत्यारा गोडसे संघ का है, उसने अपना अपराध स्वीकार कर लिया है आदि। उस काल के समाचारपत्रों में भी संघ के विषय में विषवमन किया जाता था। संघ पर हिंसक संगठन होने का आरोप तक लगा दिया गया। हालांकि यह सभी आरोप प्रमाण रहित थे। 27 फरवरी 1948 को जवाहरलाल नेहरू को भेजे गए पत्र में सरदार पटेल ने लिखा था कि अभियुक्तों के बयान से यह स्पष्ट है कि षड़यंत्र का कोई भी भाग दिल्ली में नहीं रचा गया। बयानों से यह बात भी सामने आती है कि इसमें संघ का हाथ एकदम नहीं था। हिंदू महासभा के उन्मादी लोगों ने यह षड़यंत्र रचा और क्रियान्वित किया। गांधी हत्या से जुड़ा मुकदमा दिल्ली के ऐतिहासिक लाल किले में 22 जून 1948 को शुरू हुआ था। मुकदमे के दौरान जो फैसला दिया गया उसमें संघ को कहीं दोषी नहीं ठहराया गया। इससे मजबूर होकर तत्कालीन सरकार को भी संघ पर से प्रतिबंध हटाना पड़ा। हालांकि न्यायालय के आदेश के बाद भी एक समूह विशेष संघ को गांधीजी के हत्यारे के रूप में प्रस्तुत करने पर आमादा था और इस हेतु उसने नवंबर 1966 में गांधी हत्याकांड की तहकीकात के लिए एक और जांच कमीशन बिठाया। इसके अध्यक्ष सुप्रीम कोर्ट के रिटायर्ड न्यायाधीश जेएल कपूर थे और इसे कपूर कमीशन के नाम से जाना जाता है। कपूर कमीशन के समक्ष आर.एन बनर्जी जो गांधीजी की हत्या के समय केंद्रीय सरकार के गृह सचिव थे, उन्होंने भी यह माना था कि 'यह सिद्ध नहीं हुआ कि वह (अभियुक्त) संघ के सदस्य थे।' बनर्जी ने तो यहां तक कहा था कि 'यद्यपि संघ पर प्रतिबंध लगा, किंतु इससे यह नहीं समझना चाहिए कि भारत सरकार यह मानती है कि गांधीजी की हत्या संघ के सदस्यों ने की।' मैं संघ विरोधियों को जो यह मानते हैं कि संघ गांधीजी की हत्या से प्रसन्न था, बताना चाहता हूं कि गांधीजी की हत्या की तत्कालीन सरसंघचालक गुरु गोलवलकर ने निंदा की थी और 13 दिन तक शोक मनाने की घोषणा की थी। इस दौरान शाखाओं को भी बंद कर दिया गया। मैं स्तब्ध हूं कि सभी झूठे आरोपों से दोषमुक्त होने के बाद भी राजनीतिक कारणों की वजह से संघ पर जबरन थोपा गया बदनामी का दाग हमेशा ज़िंदा रखने की कोशिशें ज़ारी हैं। संघ विचारधारा के प्रतिद्वंद्वी हमेशा से संघ को नीचा दिखाने के जतन करते रहते हैं किन्तु राष्ट्रपिता की हत्या का जो दाग संघ पर चिपका हुआ है, उसे अब जनता को सच बताकर ही धोया जा सकता है, अन्यथा संघ विरोधी हमेशा संघ को बदनाम करते रहेंगे और इसके अच्छे कार्य कभी दुनिया के समक्ष नहीं आ सकेंगे। गांधीजी की पुण्यतिथि से ही इसकी शुरुआत हो ताकि उनकी शहादत पर ओछी राजनीति न हो सके।
===============--------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment