Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made available complete and point-wise information as sought by your applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:36:15 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: urgent-action@ohchr.org

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:48:51 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: acph-rb@rb.nic.in

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:01:36 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: secypg@nic.in

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:30:44 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: shaileshgandhi@nic.in

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 02:24:39 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: s.mishra@nic.in

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:13:27 -0700
Subject: Re: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Hon'ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw
kind attention of Hon'ble Sir towards the following submissions as
follows. 1- It is submitted before the Hon'ble
Sir that your appellant through aforesaid R.T.I. letter dated 4.5.2011
desired point-wise information under 8-points. Hon'ble Sir may be
pleased to take the perusal of annexure 1 in three pages.
2- It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your
appellant was made available incomplete and summary-wise information
by the CPIO through its letter dated 3.6.2011 which is illegal and
against the provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased
to take the perusal of annexure 2 in two pages.
3- It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that it was mentioned by the
dealing assistant that petitioner already approached to various
concerned authorities but not mentioned that no solid and strong
action was taken by them even after longer duration caused to knock
the door of Hon'ble Supreme Court. Here order of Hon'ble Registrar
deprived the oppressed and downtrodden section from their right to
justice. 4- It is submitted before the Hon'ble
Sir that protection of ecology and environment and right to livelyhood
was not considered as ipso-facto obvious from the noting before
presenting the views. 5- It is submitted before
the Hon'ble Sir that dealing assistant only took the reference of
letter of petitioner dated 25.4.2011 only as ipso-facto obvious from
the noting in which it was alleged that B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur is
not complying the directions of his seniors and it seems that there is
no rule of law in uttar pradesh but it is unfortunate that he did not
take the reference of letter petition dated 15.4.2011 which is obvious
from the perusal of the note as annexure 2. Hon'ble Sir
may be pleased to pass an appropriate order to ensure transparency and
accountability in accordance with the provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005.
For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. Yours
sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh Moh- Surekapuram, Jabalpur
Road Dist- Mirzapur (U.P.) dated 12.6.2011
It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that first appellate authority
Supreme Court of India delivered Judgement on 18th july 2011 on the
aforesaid first appeal and made available to your applicant through
note No. F.1/RTI/A.222/2011 Dated-28th july2011. Hon'ble Sir may be
pleased to take the perusal of order dated 18july2011 as follows.
This appeal arises from the reply dated 3.6.2011 in
Dy.No.220/RTI/11-12/SCI of the Central Public Information Officer
(CPIO), Supreme Court of India under R.T.I. Act 2005.
The appellant by his application dated 4.5.2011 sought
information with respect to his letter letter petition dated
15.4.2011action taken thereon and whether letter petition dated
15.4.2011 addressed to Hon'ble Chief Justice of India is covered by
PIL Guidelines and if not why and how. The CPIO by the impugned reply
informed that the letter petitions dated 15.4.2011 and 25.4.2011 were
received, diarised and were lodged being not covered under PIL
Guidelines. Dissatisfied with the above reply, the appellant has
preferred this appeal. After affording an opportunity of being heard,
appeal was taken for orders. Examined the records. The appellant
sought information with respect to his petitions. The CPIO has
furnished the details including the date of receipt of above, the
diary nos. and the fate of both the letter petitions and reason for
lodging. In appeal memorandum, the appellant has challenged the reply
of CPIO essentially on merits of his letter petitions. Evidently, the
CPIO has furnished the information to the extent held by CPIO. The
legality and correctness of the decisions taken by the administrative
authority in lodging the letter petitions are not amenable to
challenge in an appeal under R.T.I. Act. Hence, the appeal
is without any merit and is dismissed.