From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:32:31 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: urgent-action@ohchr.org
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:46:56 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: acph-rb@rb.nic.in
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 01:58:26 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: secypg@nic.in
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:29:05 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: shaileshgandhi@nic.in
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 02:22:32 -0700
Subject: Fwd: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: s.mishra@nic.in
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh" <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:33:59 -0700
Subject: Re: To direct C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India to made
available complete and point-wise information as sought by your
applicant under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through
application dated 4.5.2011. Applicant is Yogi M. P. Singh Moh-
To: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Whether there is rule of law in the state of uttar pradesh. In view of
your applicant, B.D.O. Chhanbey ranks at bottom in the administrative
hierarchy but how is he defying the orders of his seniors like
schizophrenic way ?is in itself a question. Apart from this, no
punitive action has been taken against B.D.O. Chhanbey. Ipsofacto law
has been taken under teeth by the B.D.O. Chhanbey, Mirzapur but no
action was taken against him why?can be well responded by chief
secretary government of uttar pradesh. This is humble request of
your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir to pass an appropriate order in
accordance with law as you Hon'ble Sir deem fit. For this your
applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir. This is ultimate attempt of
your applicant. "O"GOD HELP ME Yogi M. P. Singh Moh- Surekapuram,
Jabalpur Road, Dist- Mirzapur(U.P.) DATED 25.4.2011
It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your applicant submitted a
communiqe under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 addressed
to C.P.I.O. Supreme Court of India dated 4.5.2011. Hon'ble Sir may be
pleased to take a glance as follows.
Subject- To furnish access to information as sought within time
specified under subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act 2005.
Hon'ble Sir/Madam. With due respect, your kind attention
is drawn towards following points in reference of which you Hon'ble
Sir have to furnish access to information within prescribed time.
1- Please take the perusal of annexure 1 in four pages. This letter
petition dated 15.4.2011 whether has been received by the registry or
not. 2- If received, what action has been taken?
3- Please made available the noting if received.
4- Whether letter petition dated 15.4.2011 addressed to Hon'ble Chief
Justice of India is covered with P.I.L. Guidelines, if not, then why
and how? 5- Please take the perusal of annexure 2 in seven
pages. This letter petition dated 25.4.2011, whether has been received
by the registry or not. 6- If received, what action has been taken?
7- Please made available the noting if
aforesaid letter petition dated 25.4.2011 if received. 8- Whether the
letter petition dated 25.4.2011 addressed to Hon'ble Chief Justice of
India is covered with P.I.L. Guidelines or not, if not, then why and
how? This is humble request to you Hon'ble
Sir/Madam to furnish access to information as sought in accordance
with law. For this your communicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble
Sir/Madam. Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh
Moh-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road , Dist- Mirzapur(U.P.) DATED 4.5.2011
It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that CPIO Supreme Court of
India through its letter DY.No.220/RTI/11-12/SCI Dated-June3,2011
made available information as follows. Subject- Application
under Right to Information Act, 2005. Sir.
With reference to your application dated 4.5.2011 received by the
under signed on 9.5.2011. I write to inform you that your letter
petitions dated 15.4.2011&25.4.2011 were received and diarised as D.
Nos.10794/2011and 12370/2011 on 30.4.2011 and 9.5.2011 respectively
and same was lodged/filed being not covered under PIL Guidelines as
per orders of registrar dated 13.5.2011. Further, please find
enclosed here with true copy of noting on your letter petition dated
15.4.2011 and 25.4.2011. Supreme Court of India PIL(ENGLISH)CELL
Diary No.-10794/2011 &12370/2011 Name of Applicant-Yogi M. P.
Singh. The Petitioner is complaining against B.D.O. Chhanbey,
Mirzapur for not following the direction of higher authorities and is
indulged in corruption. The petitioner alleges that he is not spending
actual fund sanctioned for development of the village under NREGA. He
has enclosed information sought for from the concerned department
under RTI Act. He is requesting to pass an appropriate order in this
regard. The petitioner already approached to various concerned
authorities. No action is called for. If approved, we may lodge the
letter petitions. Sd/-(Dealing Assistant)11.5.2011 No action is
called for. If approved, letter petitions may be lodged. Sd/-(Branch
Officer) 12.5.2011 'A' may pl. be approved. Sd/-(Additional
Registrar) 13.5.2011 blank space Sd/-(Registrar) It is submitted
before the Hon'ble Sir that being aggrieved with this letter of CPIO,
Supreme Court of India, as was against the spirit of R.T.I. Act 2005,
your applicant filed an appeal dated12.6.2011 under subsection 1 of
section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005 before F.A.A. Supreme Court of India.
Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of first appeal of your
applicant. Subject- To direct CPIO to made avilable complete
and point wise information as sought by your appellant under
subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 through application
letter dated 4.5.2011.
Hon'ble Sir. With due res
No comments:
Post a Comment